A scientist might infer that the afternoon snack provided a boost in energy due to its macronutrient composition, likely carbohydrates and sugars that are quickly metabolized for energy. She could also consider the possibility that the snack helped stabilize blood sugar levels, reducing fatigue. Additionally, the increase in energy might indicate a psychological or physiological response to eating, such as improved focus or motivation.
they investigate,predict,observe, and at last they hypothesis.
the answer is scientific law.
observe the natural world
Terrestrial telescope
Observe the natural world - apex 😁
They Observe, Predict and Infer
Gallo
they watch clouds.
The scientist should use an electron microscope
An observation is something you notice using your five senses, such as color, shape, or size. An inference is a conclusion you make based on observations and prior knowledge, but it may not be directly observed.
It allows a scientist to measure the wavelength of light.
Galileo
An observation is something you saw yourself, while an inference is essentially an assumption about that object. For example, if you saw a laptop in a store, you can observe that it is expensive, and you can infer that it is expensive because it works better.
Anton The_first_scientist_to_observe_living_cellsLeeuwenhoek
microscope
First you observe, then you "inference".If no observation is made you can not make an inference.You observe both the movie and the language but in order to tell good from bad you "inference".When you claim the movie is good and/or claim the language could be better, then you have applied some sort of thoughts to your observations and that is an Inference.Short answer. It should be considered an inference.It would commonly be considered an observation, but I beg to differ :-)Regards.
Experiment- "In a experiment, the scientist deliberately makes certain changes in the world about him so that he can observe the consequences."