0
A theory or speciation can be diffulcult to prove because either the scientist does not know a part of why something happens or in some cases, like the big bang, you can not go back 14 billlions years to witness it. That means that we are not 100% sure how it happened because we had no witness and we do not the the scientific technology to re-act it.
Wiki User
∙ 11y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Does the inductive method of investigation performs experiments or makes observations to prove or disprove a theory?
no
Can future testing can prove a scientific theory to be incorrect?
yes it can prove ....
When would scientists accept a theory?
probably when you can prove it
How research supports theory?
Actual research provides usable results - which will prove or disprove the theory.
Can a controlled hypothesis be called a theory?
No. Much more has to be done to prove any hypothesis a theory.
Is it possible to have an IQ of zero?
In theory, yes - but it would be extremely difficult to prove an IQ of 0.
Does the inductive method of investigation performs experiments or makes observations to prove or disprove a theory?
no
How would you prove that a certain theory is not acceptable?
By performing experiments whose goal is to prove that such theory is a mistaken theory.
Why is the quantum theory accepted?
The same reason any other theory is accepted: it explains known observations and it makes predictions that are testable by experiment (and prove correct when tested).
Prove the demorgan's laws for crisp set theory?
prove the intersction for crisp set theory
Did Charles Darwin have evidence to prove evolution?
No, of course not. Evidence does not prove evolution - it validates the theory.Evidence which Darwin had included limited fossils, and observed apparent speciation in birds.
What makes a hypothesis scientifically?
Hypotheses are useful because they can be tested, and scientists love to test to prove if whether your theory is right or wrong.
Does fact required for a theory?
Theories tend to Remain a Pseudo Fact, until proven otherwise, the theorist, is under no obligation to Prove his Theory, which makes anyone capable of writing a Theory, without using any Facts whatsoever. Of course it's always advisable to throw a few facts around within the Theory, to add some Credibility to your Theory. Remember if you could prove a theory as Fact, then it would no longer be a Theory, but a Fact.
Did seafloor spreading prove the theory of continental drift?
Seafloor spreading helped prove the theory of continental drift. Pangea theory also helped.
Why did newton prove Galileo's theory?
Newton explained his theory
How does science prove something is true?
You create a theory. Prove the theory to be true by testing it. If it works, it is true. If it does not work, it is not true.
In which country did did Einstein prove the theory of Relativity?
Einstein didn't prove the theory of relativity. It is a theory, a possible explanation, it is generally accepted because it explains a lot of things but that doesn't "prove" the theory, at least not to physicists. See related questions for the country of discovery.
