i believe his results were that after cross pollinating to non-purebred pea plants, the offspring were all tall like the female,and when he crossed the other two, he received three tall pea plants and one short
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
The results of an experiment are called your data.
An experiment in which the results are repeatable....apex
The first must be inaccurate because you are sure the second results are correct.
The results of a science experiment do not have to match the original hypothesis. Indeed, the results collected in an experiment may be completely different to those that the scientist predicted.
Division.
Dominant
RECESSIVE
reccesive
Recessive allele hahaha :D
They were homozygous.
Genetics
He needed a control group. *Apex*
P1 or parental
3:1
the F1
There were three times as many tall plants as short plants.