It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
Experiments need to be repeatable to ensure that results are reliable and can be verified by others. Repeatability allows researchers to confirm findings and rule out random chance or experimental errors. It also enhances the credibility of scientific research, fostering trust in the conclusions drawn from the data. Ultimately, repeatable experiments contribute to the advancement of knowledge by enabling further exploration and validation of scientific claims.
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
Very False. Science experiments are only worthwhile if they are repeatable and repeated.
Science investigates models of natural law using repeatable experiments as the ultimate arbiter. In contrast, history investigates past events by considering physical evidence, documentary evidence, and eyewitness testimony.
It is only science if it can be repeated, so yes, experiments do need to be repeatable in order for something to be proven. The results of the experiment should be comperable if something is to be learned.
Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid.
Experiments need to be repeatable to ensure that results are reliable and can be verified by others. Repeatability allows researchers to confirm findings and rule out random chance or experimental errors. It also enhances the credibility of scientific research, fostering trust in the conclusions drawn from the data. Ultimately, repeatable experiments contribute to the advancement of knowledge by enabling further exploration and validation of scientific claims.
When it comes to superstitions, there are none. Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies on a weakness of a believer.
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
Science relies on repeatable, redundant results from experiments in order to consider it valid. Superstition relies a weakness in a believer.
The results of studying the hypothesis are not repeatable and are open to judgement. The hypothesis cannot be tested by controlled experiments.
They must be repeatable
Very False. Science experiments are only worthwhile if they are repeatable and repeated.
Science investigates models of natural law using repeatable experiments as the ultimate arbiter. In contrast, history investigates past events by considering physical evidence, documentary evidence, and eyewitness testimony.
Science is the study of the universe: its life, its composition, and the physics that guide the universe. However, to be strictly scientific, a scientist must learn through the process of asking questions, answering them through scientific experiments, and his or her results must be repeatable.
Experiments need imagination