0
Generally, one makes a casual observation - apples fall from a tree - and from this one generates an hypothesis - a casual explanation for the observation.
With the hypothesis in mind, an experiment is designed to test or prove/disprove the hypothesis.
With a sufficient number of experiments under your belt, you may now form a theory, which is a much firmer type of being. It may be capable of more general application.
Wiki User
∙ 13y ago
Wiki User
∙ 13y agoto get accurate information and explain information better
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Theories
Why must a scientist begin by making observations?
In order for a scientist to solve a problem or learn more about a phenomenon, they must first see it in order to know that it exists. Also, observations allow scientists to make educated guesses, called hypotheses, to try and explain what is causing a phenomenon.
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
What scientific attitude must a person possess in seeking answers to things in which he is greatly interested?
The scientific attitude which a person must possess in order to seek answers, is the willingness to accept the validity of his or her observations, whether they confirm or disprove existing ideas about whatever it is that is under investigation. In other words, he or she must seek answers without bias.
What must happen for scientific theories to be accepted as valid?
One of the conditions that must be satisfied is that it must match the evidence that is provided. Next it should be able to predict things. Lastly, it's statement must be able to be verified independently.
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Theories
Scientific what must be supported by observations and results from many investigators and are not absolute?
theories :)
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute.?
Theories
Why must a scientist begin by making observations?
In order for a scientist to solve a problem or learn more about a phenomenon, they must first see it in order to know that it exists. Also, observations allow scientists to make educated guesses, called hypotheses, to try and explain what is causing a phenomenon.
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
If you are making a left turn you must begin?
with turning the left signal light on.
What do all scientific names begin with?
All scientific names of organisms begin with the genus name followed by the species name.
What are the special skills to be a zoologist?
A zoologist must possess knowledge in the sciences like biology, chemistry, and physics. He or she must be able to apply critical thinking to every day problems and draw conclusions from scientific observations.
What scientific attitude must a person possess in seeking answers to things in which he is greatly interested?
The scientific attitude which a person must possess in order to seek answers, is the willingness to accept the validity of his or her observations, whether they confirm or disprove existing ideas about whatever it is that is under investigation. In other words, he or she must seek answers without bias.
What is Empiricism in Nursing theory?
Empiricism in nursing theory emphasizes the importance of using evidence from observations and experiences to guide nursing practice. Nurses gather data through direct observation of patients to inform their clinical decision-making and interventions. This approach promotes a scientific and objective basis for nursing care.
How do you know that evolution is a theory?
It is a well-established, well-tested, well-supported, comprehensive model for the explanation of a well-defined set of observations in various branches of science. That is the definition of what a scientific theory must be, and thus evolutionary theory is a scientific theory.
What is a sientific theory?
Scientific theory involves a collection of concepts of observable phenomena expressed as quantifiable properties with rules (laws) that express relationships between the observations of such concepts. A theory is a good theory if it satisfies two requirements: It must accurately describe a large class of observations on the basis of a model that contains only a few arbitrary elements, and it must make definite predictions about the results of future observations.
