0
Generally, one makes a casual observation - apples fall from a tree - and from this one generates an hypothesis - a casual explanation for the observation.
With the hypothesis in mind, an experiment is designed to test or prove/disprove the hypothesis.
With a sufficient number of experiments under your belt, you may now form a theory, which is a much firmer type of being. It may be capable of more general application.
What else can I help you with?
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Theories
Why must a scientist begin by making observations?
In order for a scientist to solve a problem or learn more about a phenomenon, they must first see it in order to know that it exists. Also, observations allow scientists to make educated guesses, called hypotheses, to try and explain what is causing a phenomenon.
What test must a scientific theory pass in other to be considered valid?
For a scientific theory to be considered valid, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning that it can be subjected to experiments or observations that could potentially disprove it. Additionally, the theory should be consistent with existing evidence and capable of making accurate predictions about future observations. Peer review and reproducibility of results by independent researchers further enhance its credibility within the scientific community.
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
What must a scientific method?
The scientific method is a systematic approach to inquiry that involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. It emphasizes empirical evidence and reproducibility to validate findings. Critical to this process is the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where results can lead to new questions and further investigation. Ultimately, the scientific method aids in building a reliable body of knowledge about the natural world.
Scientific what must be supported by observations and results from many investigators and are not absolute?
Scientific theories.
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute?
Theories
Scientific must be supported by observations and results from many investigations and are not absolute.?
Theories
Why must a scientist begin by making observations?
In order for a scientist to solve a problem or learn more about a phenomenon, they must first see it in order to know that it exists. Also, observations allow scientists to make educated guesses, called hypotheses, to try and explain what is causing a phenomenon.
What test must a scientific theory pass in other to be considered valid?
For a scientific theory to be considered valid, it must be testable and falsifiable, meaning that it can be subjected to experiments or observations that could potentially disprove it. Additionally, the theory should be consistent with existing evidence and capable of making accurate predictions about future observations. Peer review and reproducibility of results by independent researchers further enhance its credibility within the scientific community.
What do all scientific names begin with?
All scientific name must have at least two words that are commonly in Latin.
Why is creationism not usually regarded as a scientific theory today?
For a model to be scientific, it must adhere to scientific principles. - It must have explanatory power: it must show how the hypothesized mechanisms logically yield the observations claimed to support the hypothesis. - The above requirement also automatically leads to an additional requirement: the model must yield predictions about future observations. For instance, if what we know about gravity is correct, then one would expect future observations to reflect predictable behaviour. Any observation inconsistent with such predictions would lead to rejection or revision of the model. - It must be consistent with known scientific laws: for instance, any model that violates the law of conservation of energy would automatically be suspect. - It must be falsifiable: there must be the hypothetical possibility of observations that would, if they were made, cause the model to be rejected or at least revised. - The observations that support the hypothesis must be repeatable and independently verifiable. For instance, a morphological assay of fossil forms based on the same dataset performed by independent scientists must be capable of yielding the same phylogenetic tree. - It must be parsimonious: the model should depend on as few unsupportable assumptions as necessary to match the above requirements. Creationism violates at least some and possibly all of the above requirements, and can therefore not be regarded a scientific model.
What must observations avoid?
Observations should avoid being biased, making assumptions, and drawing overly generalized conclusions. It is important for observations to be objective, specific, and based on actual evidence in order to be reliable and useful for analysis.
An explanation that is based on prior scientific research or observations and that can be tested?
A scientific explanation is a hypothesis derived from existing research or observations that can be tested through experiments or further observation. It must be based on empirical evidence and subject to scrutiny and validation by the scientific community. By testing the explanation, scientists can determine its validity and refine our understanding of the natural world.
If you are making a left turn you must begin?
with turning the left signal light on.
What must a scientific method?
The scientific method is a systematic approach to inquiry that involves making observations, forming hypotheses, conducting experiments, and analyzing data to draw conclusions. It emphasizes empirical evidence and reproducibility to validate findings. Critical to this process is the iterative nature of scientific inquiry, where results can lead to new questions and further investigation. Ultimately, the scientific method aids in building a reliable body of knowledge about the natural world.
What must be based on many observations and supported by experimental results?
A scientific theory must be based on many observations and supported by experimental results. It synthesizes a wide range of evidence to explain phenomena and predict future outcomes. Theories undergo rigorous testing and peer review, ensuring their reliability and validity within the scientific community. Ultimately, they provide a comprehensive understanding of natural processes.
