Philippine bureaucratic behavior can generally be categorized into three types: patrimonialism, where personal relationships and loyalty influence decision-making; clientelism, which involves the exchange of goods and services for political support; and nepotism, where favoritism is shown to family and friends in appointments and resource allocation. These behaviors often stem from cultural norms and historical contexts, impacting the efficiency and transparency of government operations. Additionally, bureaucratic red tape and inefficiency can also characterize the system, hindering effective governance.
Bureaucratic control is the use of rules, policies, hierarchy of authority, written documentation, reward systems, and other formal mechanisms to influence employee behavior and assess performance. Bureaucratic control can be used when behavior can be controlled with market or price mechanisms.
Vulnerability to nepotism.Perpetuation of the spoils system.Apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct.Survival of historical experience.Nonspecial typing of bureaucrats.Lack of independence from politics.Essential instruments of social change.
The differences in bureaucratic control and clan control are partly based on organizational culture. For example, in order for clan control to work, the organization must have a good amount of trust in its employees. Bureaucratic control is based more on setting rules and relying on certain mechanisms to control behavior.
Bureaucratic conteol
1. Increasing efficiency in workers by specialization of the task among the group, arranging the members in a hierarchy of rank, limiting the ability for a small number to have too much power, and by grouping them together. 2. Giving incentives to those under you to make them loyal and trusting of you and get motivation to complete their given task. 3. The administrator enforces reponsibility and coordinates the activites of those under their watch.
bureaucratic and patron-client organizations
Bureaucratic organizations have a hierarchical structure with clear rules and procedures, while non-bureaucratic organizations tend to be more flexible and decentralized. Bureaucratic organizations emphasize formal authority and standardized processes, whereas non-bureaucratic organizations may prioritize innovation and adaptability.
An important assumption in bureaucratic justice is the presumption of guilt. It is considered that the bureaucratic system of justice can contribute to a perception of unfairness.
The apathetic public reaction to bureaucratic misconduct in the Philippines often stems from widespread disenchantment with government institutions, leading to a sense of helplessness among citizens. Many individuals feel that reporting misconduct will not lead to meaningful change, resulting in a culture of resignation and indifference. This apathy can perpetuate corruption and inefficiency, as the lack of accountability allows unethical practices to continue unchallenged. Ultimately, the cycle of misconduct and public indifference undermines trust in governance and hinders progress towards reform.
The leading proponent of the theory of bureaucratic rule was the German sociologist Max Weber, who argued that all large organizations tend toward the bureaucratic form.
A bureaucratic drift is a kind of theory that tells about the tendency of bureaucratic agencies to create new policy that comes from the original mandate. It produced legislation that come from elected officials.