0
A historian want to know How the Gulf was Fought which is an appropriate way to use primary sources to answer this question?
An historian wants to know how the Gulf War was fought.what is the appropriate way to use primary source?
What else can I help you with?
Why is it important for a historian to use primary sources?
Primary sources that are thoughtfully selected can help to bring history and cultures to life for students. Most basically, they are defined as the direct evidence of a time and place that you are studying - any material (documents, objects, etc.) that was produced by eyewitnesses to or participants in an event or historical moment under investigation. Primary sources are interesting to read for their own sake: they give us first hand, you-are-there insights into the past. They are also the most important tools an historian has for developing an understanding of an event. Primary sources serve as the evidence an historian uses in developing an interpretation and in building an argument to support that interpretation. You will be using primary sources not only to help you better understand what went on, but also as evidence as you answer questions and develop arguments about the past. Primary Sources do not speak for themselves, they have to be interpreted. That is, we can't always immediately understand what a primary source means, especially if it is from a culture significantly different from our own. It is therefore necessary to try to understand what it means and to figure out what the source can tell us about the past.
How would a secondary sources be beneficial to a historian studying a particular event?
Secondary sources provide historians with interpretations and analyses of primary data, offering context and insights that may not be immediately apparent from original documents alone. They synthesize information from various primary sources, helping to highlight trends, differing perspectives, and scholarly debates surrounding the event. Additionally, secondary sources often include citations and references that can guide historians toward further research and primary materials. Overall, they enrich a historian's understanding by situating events within broader historical narratives.
What are the classification of historical sources?
Primary sources and secondary sources
What sources are the original records of an event?
Primary sources.
Why are sources important to historians?
They summarize conclusions about primary sources.
A historian wants to know how the Gulf War was fought. Which of the following is an appropriate way to use primary sources to answer this question?
(Apex) Interview soldiers who served on both sides of the conflict.
What is the correct name for a historian's 'clues'?
The correct name for a historian's 'clue' is sources.
Why would a historian use a primary source when studying about historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Why would a historian use primary source when studying about a historical event?
Answer this question… Primary sources are created by people who actually experienced the event
Is a historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain a primary or secondary source and why?
A historian's account of Julius Caesar's victory against Spain is a secondary source not a primary source. Secondary sources analyze and explain primary sources. Primary sources are documents or objects that were created during the time being studied.
Which best explains how a historian synthesized evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
Which best explains how a historian synthesizes evidence to reach a conclusion?
The historian makes comparisons among multiple primary and secondary sources.
What two main types of sources does a historian use?
A historian uses primary sources, which are firsthand accounts or original documents from the time under study, to gain a direct understanding of historical events. They also use secondary sources, such as books or articles written by other scholars, which interpret and analyze primary sources to provide context and a broader understanding of the historical period.
What is an example of a primary source that a historian might use to study the colonial era?
What are three examples of primary sources a hitorisn might use
Is the campaigns of Alexander a primary source?
Yes , Arrian was able to use sources now lost to the modern historian .
What items in the list are primary sources a historian could use to contextualize why a political revolution occurred in Egypt in 2011?
I and IV
Is wikipeadia a appropriate source for an academic paper?
No. Use the internet to find primary sources.
