About the same difference between World War 2 and World War 1. The warplane and the tank were first used in World War 1, but armies were unable to move fast enough for long enough to exploit the break in the enemy line. This situation was rectified early in World War 2, and it kept the Gulf War from becoming a replay of World War 1. The new emphasis was on rapid mobility and attack rather than static defense. Also, World War 1 was the only war in which chemical warfare was legally used. There was concern that Hussein might use it on the Gulf Coalition as he had done earlier against the Kurds and Shiites in Iraq. As in World War 2, both sides in the Gulf War had the ability to wage chemical warfare, and yet it was not used.
Im smart all right.
http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/war_spending.php
The cold war,The Korean War, Vietnam, War, Desert Storm, and The Iraq war.
Oil
The allies had more navy and air force and the axis had more military
Well the war in Iraq really has nothing to di with the American Civil War.
Im smart all right.
Canada played a much biggger part in World war two
http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/08/war_spending.php
you take to subjects and write about what they have in common and what they don't have in common like the Vietnam war and the war in Iraq.
Most people know what the Vietnam War is; what is the American War?
Ww2 was a war and iraq is stupid
i dont no and have nice day
how was the movie "gone with the wind compared to the civil war
During World War 2 the total casualty lost by Iraq were only about 500.
The Iraq War.
Iraq gave us the ability to be armed during war.