Actually he had 2 types of soldiers in his army ; 1) Housecarls ; these were professional soldiers , they were well trained & also paid . 2) Fyrd ; these were part time , unpaid soldiers that were called up when the country (England ) was in danger .
It is thought that William had 3000 cavalry, 1000 archers and the rest infantry. But Harold had no cavalry, fewer archers thus his army was mostly infantry, as he lost most of his troops on the way from Stamford Bridge. So it was most probably William who had more troops. Hope i was a good help :)
footmen calvery and archers were used in the battle of Hastings for William to win it
A Fyrd is a part of the english army that are farmers and huntsmen, and do not have very good weapons. They also fight on foot and are not very well trained.
Invading Norman forces on one side, and King Harold's army on the other. William the duke of Normandy was the leader of the Norman army,and Harold the king of England was the leader of the Anglo Saxon army
Actually he had 2 types of soldiers in his army ; 1) Housecarls ; these were professional soldiers , they were well trained & also paid . 2) Fyrd ; these were part time , unpaid soldiers that were called up when the country (England ) was in danger .
It is thought that William had 3000 cavalry, 1000 archers and the rest infantry. But Harold had no cavalry, fewer archers thus his army was mostly infantry, as he lost most of his troops on the way from Stamford Bridge. So it was most probably William who had more troops. Hope i was a good help :)
Harold called his untrained army the "fyrd." The fyrd was a medieval militia composed of free men who were summoned to serve in times of war. This force was often less experienced than professional soldiers, relying on local farmers and townspeople to defend their territory.
A fyrd was a part time soldier called up in times of war. Housecarls were full time professional soldiers.
footmen calvery and archers were used in the battle of Hastings for William to win it
Harold's army was a fairly typical Anglo-Saxon army. It was a fyrd, which was a sort of militia army. It was almost entirely infantry, and was supported by Harold's housecarles, an elite heavy infantry force. Since the fyrd was defending, they deployed using the "shieldwall", which was a defensive stance that involved the soldiers standing close together so their large shields resembled a protective wall. Additionally, they set up on a hill, which made their defensive formation even more effective.William's army was a "modern" (for that time) army. It was about half infantry, and the other half was cavalry (knights) and missile troops (archers and crossbowmen). It was more tactically flexible than Harold's old-style fyrd, and when they were initially unable to bypass the fyrd's shieldwall, they were able to adapt and ultimately defeat it.
A Fyrd is a part of the english army that are farmers and huntsmen, and do not have very good weapons. They also fight on foot and are not very well trained.
Housecarls were the professional soldiers of the King's personal guard. The fyrd were the part-time soldiers mainly made up of farmers.
Fyrd Cavalry Housecarl Archers Knights
Invading Norman forces on one side, and King Harold's army on the other. William the duke of Normandy was the leader of the Norman army,and Harold the king of England was the leader of the Anglo Saxon army
No, Harold Godwinson did not use horses in combat during the Battle of Hastings in 1066. His army primarily consisted of infantry, including housecarls (elite soldiers) and the fyrd (militia), who fought on foot. The Normans, led by William the Conqueror, utilized cavalry effectively, which contributed to their victory in the battle.
William was low on morale since some of his soldiers were leaving and there were rumors of William's death. He had to try a previous plan again. This was to run up Caldbec Hill and then start retreating to make Harold's soldiers give chase. They fell for the trick and were surrounded and killed.