Stalin and his minions (hangmen) characterized those atrocities as necessary for the revolution to survive regardless of the terrible suffering it caused millions of people. They considered it justifiable. The truth of the matter was that it was really all about preserving their power in government.
The communist revolution was mostly about class warfare. Stalin was out to wipe out classes of people, such as those whom they deemed "counterrevolutionary." However, "counterrevolutionary" activity began to mean anything that was against the new government. The so-called communist revolution was supposed to alleviate the suffering that the ordinary Russian experienced at the hands of the tsars and the aristocracy. As it turned out, the Russian people suffered far more than they had under the Tsars.
Collectivization was designed to wipe out that class of peasant that happened to own a little land or just some livestock. The land was not given to the other peasants as the Bolsheviks had promised. Land was kept by the government.
The purges were designed to rid the Communist Party, the government and the military of anyone who might be a threat to Stalin's authority.
As a result of Stalin's collectivization of agriculture, Ukraine's population faced massive starvation which resulted in millions of deaths.
No, quite the opposite.
sounds like a homework question... or a study guide...
The collective, and as the collective was controlled by the state, ultimately the state.
Answer this question… protest against the government by destroying crops
stalin introduced collectivization of agriculture
As a result of Stalin's collectivization of agriculture, Ukraine's population faced massive starvation which resulted in millions of deaths.
Under Vladimier Lenin, Russia began collectivization. This process continued, and did accelerate under Josef Stalin, who followed Lenin. But, Stalin did not cause the acceleration, the communist philosophy that Russia followed called for collectivization.
"productive"
"productive"
He eliminated them as a class
No, quite the opposite.
Through the collectivization.
-forced collectivization -stalin wanting to rapidly industrailize
sounds like a homework question... or a study guide...
The collective, and as the collective was controlled by the state, ultimately the state.
False. "Collectivization" is attributed for the soviet famine in the early 1930's, killing millions.