New England had a harsher climate. The colonists could do farming only for their own household. They made a living by fishing or shipbuilding. Many of them were Protestants, generally Separatists. They believed strongly in education feeling that the ability to read the Bible would help their souls.
The Middle Colonies had a milder climate. They could grow wheat and grind it to make bread which was sold for other products. They were less strict about their religion. The Quakers of Pennsylvania and New Jersey tolerated other religions. Rhode Island also had freedom of religion. New York had dairy farms and apple orchards.
The Northern colonies had religious freedom with total separation from the church and state, so that was good news to the Puritans. The Middle colonies also had religious freedom and also had a voice in government.
This was because the New England colonies were comprised of Puritans and Separatists. The Puritans wanted to reform the church, while the Separatists wanted to break away from the church and set up their own churches.In the Middle Colonies were the people called the Quakers. These people are/were very tolerant of everyone's beliefs regarding life and religious views, hope you found this helpful :)
because of imigration. Northern colonies had the Dutch, British, Native Americans, Germans.
On the whole, the New England and Middle Colonies of America in the 17th and 18th centuries did not contain widespread nor economically significant slave-holding. That slavery was initially legal is undeniable; however, by contrast with the Southern colonies, the basic way of life of these colonies was not dependent on slave-labor in any important respect.
they farmed and washed clothes and etc.
The colonies were separated into the New England Colonies, the Middle Colonies, and the Southern Colonies.
New England.
reading
The Northern colonies had religious freedom with total separation from the church and state, so that was good news to the Puritans. The Middle colonies also had religious freedom and also had a voice in government.
This was because the New England colonies were comprised of Puritans and Separatists. The Puritans wanted to reform the church, while the Separatists wanted to break away from the church and set up their own churches.In the Middle Colonies were the people called the Quakers. These people are/were very tolerant of everyone's beliefs regarding life and religious views, hope you found this helpful :)
The middle colonies had milder temperatures than the northern colonies. Also, the land was suitable for growing many more crops. The land in the northern colonies was hard and rocky, but the land in the middle colonies was less rocky and the soil was more fertile.
because of imigration. Northern colonies had the Dutch, British, Native Americans, Germans.
the majority of the people made their living by farming. farmers found more favorable conditions in the middle colonies than in New England. the broad hudson and delaware river valleys were rich and fertile. winters were milder than in New England, and the growing season lasted longer.
how
This was because the New England colonies were comprised of Puritans and Separatists. The Puritans wanted to reform the church, while the Separatists wanted to break away from the church and set up their own churches.In the Middle Colonies were the people called the Quakers. These people are/were very tolerant of everyone's beliefs regarding life and religious views, hope you found this helpful :)
This was because the New England colonies were comprised of Puritans and Separatists. The Puritans wanted to reform the church, while the Separatists wanted to break away from the church and set up their own churches.In the Middle Colonies were the people called the Quakers. These people are/were very tolerant of everyone's beliefs regarding life and religious views, hope you found this helpful :)
On the whole, the New England and Middle Colonies of America in the 17th and 18th centuries did not contain widespread nor economically significant slave-holding. That slavery was initially legal is undeniable; however, by contrast with the Southern colonies, the basic way of life of these colonies was not dependent on slave-labor in any important respect.