That's a very debateable point. Military governments traditionally are extremely restrictive in allowing personal freedoms of their citizens, and often result in a failed state forming due to mass insurrection against the military government forming. The advantage of it, at least from the standpoint of the country's leaders, is that it's a direct Dictatorship, where the directives of the government can be carried out without being tied up by the political process. Whether it's actually advantageous for the citizens of Nigeria, is questionable at best.another advantage is public opinion which i think is a good issue to look at.
Civilian government is generally considered better than military government because it promotes democratic principles, such as accountability, human rights, and the rule of law. Civilian leaders are typically elected by the populace, ensuring that governance reflects the will of the people, whereas military governments often rely on force and coercion. Additionally, civilian governments tend to foster political stability and economic development by encouraging civic engagement and participation in decision-making processes. This can lead to more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to the often authoritarian and repressive nature of military rule.
Assuming that the legal civilian government has directed them to use force, yes. If you are wondering about the political implications of using military force in that manner then a political forum would be a better location for this question.
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. Civilian rule is like having a fancy dinner party with etiquette and democracy, while military rule is like a frat party with tanks and uniforms. So yeah, civilian rule is definitely the way to go if you want a society that values freedom and human rights over marching orders and curfews.
then it lets them control military better
A Confederate force is to be understood as a military unit or more military units, whose consistency is not better specified, pertaining to the CSA Army and performing a military operation.
Points on Military government is better than Civilian government
there are more rules in military than civilian
Civilian law and military are very unalike. Unless the civilian lawyer is skilled and practiced at military law, I would go with the military counsel every time.
Civilian government is generally considered better than military government because it promotes democratic principles, such as accountability, human rights, and the rule of law. Civilian leaders are typically elected by the populace, ensuring that governance reflects the will of the people, whereas military governments often rely on force and coercion. Additionally, civilian governments tend to foster political stability and economic development by encouraging civic engagement and participation in decision-making processes. This can lead to more sustainable and inclusive growth compared to the often authoritarian and repressive nature of military rule.
Yes! Civillian rule is much better cus it is the power of the people while millitary rule is done through coercion.....
civilian rule is better than military rule because there is freedom and peace in the nation better than when the military was ruling us
Nigeria may be a better and more developed country. Obasanjo did improve nigeria but not as much as he could have. Nigeria needs a people who have good morals and want nigeria to change for the better.
It is more civilized and humane. NOBAMA
Well actually to be a good community you need both because think of segregation. If it were civilian rule black people would still be in separate schools and public places than white people. Military rule is bad sometimes because it may turn into a Dictatorship
The military rules by force and not by the will of the people. Military rule is seldom for the good of the people. Civil rights, in fact basic human rights are often none existent under military rule.The military are AUTHORITARIAN in nature.The civilians gives room for public opinion which is lacking in military
Assuming that the legal civilian government has directed them to use force, yes. If you are wondering about the political implications of using military force in that manner then a political forum would be a better location for this question.
Well, honey, let me break it down for you. Civilian rule is like having a fancy dinner party with etiquette and democracy, while military rule is like a frat party with tanks and uniforms. So yeah, civilian rule is definitely the way to go if you want a society that values freedom and human rights over marching orders and curfews.