The argument in favor of American expansion in the Pacific centered around economic interests, national security, and the belief in Manifest Destiny. Proponents believed that acquiring territories like Hawaii and the Philippines would provide new markets for American goods and enhance trade, particularly with Asia. Additionally, expanding the U.S. presence in the Pacific was seen as a way to strengthen national security and counter European Imperialism in the region. This expansion was often justified by a sense of cultural superiority and the desire to spread American values and democracy.
Opportunities.
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
everyone did not have health care
majority opinion. -apex
Ha-ha I don't know.. listen to the teacher next time!
Opportunities.
Which statement reflects an accurate argument in favor of a command economy
andrew carnegie
More Traditional
Andrew Carnegie
Macaulay's argument in favor of the Reform Bill of 1832 that were really convincing was his argument in favour of parliamentary reform. Thank you very much, but what exactly is his argument. I'm reading over the Bill and just cannot understand what his argument actually is.
go to give
smd
the sugar planters
they opposed it
everyone did not have health care
everyone did not have health care