0
What else can I help you with?
Why did the government use 911 as an excuse to go to iraq?
9-11, per se, was not the reason Iraq was invaded. The US government believed, incorrectly, that Iraq was supporting terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda and may have been willing to furnish those organizations some weapons of mass destruction.
To what extent should nations develop weapons of mass destruction?
In actuallity they should not, but some will so others have to as a deterent.
Why did the US go into war with Iraq in 2003?
The US has been in conflict with Iraq several times.The leader of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, has, in the past, been a very aggressive leader, continuing to launch attacks in Kuwait, Syria, and Iran.In the early 2000's, the Central Intelligence Agency received intelligence that Saddam had access to "Weapons of Mass Destruction", so President Bush turned this information over to the United Nations and North Atlantic Treaty Organization.The UN took concern over it and requested that inspectors be deployed to Iraq to try to find if Saddam actually did have access to these weapons or not, but Saddam refused to cooperate.In response, the UN/NATO deployed soldiers to Iraq, believing it was a better choice than allowing Saddam to continue his operations in secrecy. This is what led to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq.By the end of the conflict, Saddam had been detained and executed. These high-powered weapons were never found, and some believe that Iraq never had access to them, but such comments are debateable.At the end of the day, it was a good excuse to wipe out a hostile dictator.
What was president bushs justification for going to war with Iraq?
George Bush told America it was nessecary to invade Iraq because they had weapons of mass destruction, but apparently, those weapons were never found. Others think Bush actually invaded Iraq for oil. Saddam Hussein was changing excess petrodollars into petroeuros so the army invaded Iraq and took over the oil again
Where were the WMD?
The whereabouts of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq became a significant point of contention after the 2003 invasion, as no substantial stockpiles were found despite initial claims that they existed. Investigations, including those by the Iraq Survey Group, concluded that Iraq had dismantled its WMD programs in the late 1990s and was not actively producing them at the time of the invasion. Some chemical weapons remnants were discovered, but they were outdated and not part of a structured program. Ultimately, the absence of WMD led to widespread criticism of the intelligence assessments that justified the war.
What are some of the effects that mass destruction weapons have on populations?
death
What are some of the best Hip Hop albums?
Weapons of mass destruction by Xzibit.
What is the current war in Iraq being fought over?
The current "War in Iraq" is being fought, because Saddam Hussein had some weapons of mass destruction or (WMDs) that he wouldn't destroy, also George Bush accused him of having connections with terrorists.
Where did Iran get weapons of mass destruction?
It depends on the particular weapon. Some were developed in Iran. Some came to Iran from the United States when Iran was under the Shah. Some came to Iran from the Soviet Union during the Iran-Iraq War.
Why did the government use 911 as an excuse to go to iraq?
9-11, per se, was not the reason Iraq was invaded. The US government believed, incorrectly, that Iraq was supporting terrorist organizations like Al-Qaeda and may have been willing to furnish those organizations some weapons of mass destruction.
What was the justification for the US going to war with Iraq?
The justification for the US going to war with Iraq is slightly open to question and debate. The main reason given was because they believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they had to be disarmed. Many believe it was simply to remove Saddam Hussein though and some even think it was for reasons of oil.
Why did public opinion turn against the war on Iraq?
Well, first, it turned out there were no "weapons of mass destruction". There was no nuclear weapons stockpile. Second, the war disrupted Iraq's government, killed its leader, and disrupted Middle East stability. Third, many US and Allied Soldiers were killed or hurt. Fourth, some experts say the Iraq War let ISIS gain more power.
To what extent should nations develop weapons of mass destruction?
In actuallity they should not, but some will so others have to as a deterent.
Why did the US go into war with Iraq in 2003?
The US has been in conflict with Iraq several times.The leader of Iraq, Saddam Hussein, has, in the past, been a very aggressive leader, continuing to launch attacks in Kuwait, Syria, and Iran.In the early 2000's, the Central Intelligence Agency received intelligence that Saddam had access to "Weapons of Mass Destruction", so President Bush turned this information over to the United Nations and North Atlantic Treaty Organization.The UN took concern over it and requested that inspectors be deployed to Iraq to try to find if Saddam actually did have access to these weapons or not, but Saddam refused to cooperate.In response, the UN/NATO deployed soldiers to Iraq, believing it was a better choice than allowing Saddam to continue his operations in secrecy. This is what led to the 2003 Invasion of Iraq.By the end of the conflict, Saddam had been detained and executed. These high-powered weapons were never found, and some believe that Iraq never had access to them, but such comments are debateable.At the end of the day, it was a good excuse to wipe out a hostile dictator.
What was president bushs justification for going to war with Iraq?
George Bush told America it was nessecary to invade Iraq because they had weapons of mass destruction, but apparently, those weapons were never found. Others think Bush actually invaded Iraq for oil. Saddam Hussein was changing excess petrodollars into petroeuros so the army invaded Iraq and took over the oil again
What are some cons against going to war in Iraq?
Some cons against war in Iraq are... 1) We have been fighting a POINTLESS war for 8 years 2) It is costing us 5 billion dollars per month or 11 million per hour 3) There were no weapons of mass destruction 4) We are spending money on oil in Iraq, fueling their economy & they are just killing us with our own money. P.S Wortman is gay
Where were the WMD?
The whereabouts of weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq became a significant point of contention after the 2003 invasion, as no substantial stockpiles were found despite initial claims that they existed. Investigations, including those by the Iraq Survey Group, concluded that Iraq had dismantled its WMD programs in the late 1990s and was not actively producing them at the time of the invasion. Some chemical weapons remnants were discovered, but they were outdated and not part of a structured program. Ultimately, the absence of WMD led to widespread criticism of the intelligence assessments that justified the war.
