I think it was the Articles of Confederation?
Caleb Strong, a prominent politician and a delegate from Massachusetts, was critical of the Articles of Confederation. He believed that the Articles created a weak federal government that lacked the authority to effectively manage national issues, particularly in areas such as trade and defense. Strong advocated for a stronger central government, which ultimately led him to support the Constitutional Convention in 1787 as a necessary step to address the deficiencies of the Articles. His views reflected a broader sentiment among many leaders of the time who recognized the need for a more effective governing structure.
The Articles of Confederation's greatest weakness, was that it had no direct origin in the people themselves. It only knew state sovereignty.
i think it is the Articles of Confederation??
they didnt like it and grew very angry. But there was nothing they could do to stop the articles from being law.
I think the articles.
I think it is articles of confederation and it was after gaining independence.
No
articles of confederation i think not sure
I think it was the Articles of Confederation?
I think because they could not make rules for the states
Before the United States Constitution, the Articles of Confederation were used to govern the United States. Their greatest weakness is that, under them, the Federal Government had no power. It could make laws and decisions, but it had no way to ensure that they were enforced.
There really were no successes of the Articles of Confederation. The only thing I can think of would be our ideas that transferred over to the Declaration. Mainly, the articles were a huge flop in our history. Sorry I couldn't give you what you wanted.
They didn't, but they replaced them with the constitution.
25 i think.........
The Articles of Confederation's greatest weakness, was that it had no direct origin in the people themselves. It only knew state sovereignty.
Think about it. Its your homework. mamon wey