The ancient Roman senate was nothing like our present day senates. Only the name is identical. It was not an elected body and it was not a legislative body either. The Roman senate was originally a body of aristocrats (patricians) who were appointed by the king and advised the kings during the period of the Roman Monarchy. During the period of the Roman Republic the senate was still an advisory body, but for the consuls, the two annually elected heads of the Republic. Over time, it also came to include former executive officers of state who automatically received a seat in the senate for live. This gave access to the senate to wealthy non-patricians who had gained the right to be elected for the offices of state. The senators were enrolled by an official called the censor on the basis of wealth and suitability of character.
During the Roman Republic, the senate was a body where matters of policy were discussed and policy recommendations for the consuls were made. The consuls usually followed it advice. This made the senate the most powerful political body of the Republic. Moreover, the Roman executive did not have a centralised form of government, like an administration or a cabinet. There were five types of officers of state who acted independently within the remit of their offices. In addition to this, , their term of office was only one year, apart from the censor, whose term of office was 18 months. Therefore, the senate provided both policy consistency and policy continuity and was the centrepiece of policy formulation. The senate also supervised the treasurers (the quaestors) and advised the Assembly of the Soldiers before it voted on war or peace.
Rome's wars of expansion into Italy and beyond increased the power of the senate. It became the body which enabled the co-ordination of the deployment of several armies at the same time and the establishment of Roman colonies (settlements) in the conquered territories. It was responsible for tax collection in the Roman provinces (conquered territories). The governors of the provinces were chosen by the senators from among themselves by lot. The drawback of the latter was that it allowed the provincial governors to treat their provinces as their personal fiefs and personal power bases.
In addition to the above, despite not being a legislative body (it nether drafted bills nor voted on legislation) the senate also issued the senatum consulta, which were texts promulgated by the senate on draft bills presented to the senate by the consuls. . It was considered normal practice to seek a consultum (singular) prior to submitting a bill to the vote of the popular assemblies. The consulta expressed the opinion of the senate on the matters referred and they had only an advisory capacity. In practice the consuls usually followed the consulta to the letter. A hostile consultum would lead to a modification of the bill or its abandonment. However, if it conflicted with a passed law, the latter overrode the consultum. Originally the senate could veto approved laws on the grounds of technicalities with the senatum acutoritas. Later a law determined that the senatus acutoritas could only be issued before the vote. In n 287 BC a laws abolished the senatus acutoritas.
During the period of rule by emperors, the senate became little more than a rubber stamp for the emperor.
The Senate proposed a law, then voting assemblies cast their vote. In a different time of Ancient Rome, the Emperor proposed a law and the Senate either denied or passed it.
The office of dictator in ancient Rome was usually only for six months. However if the problem was not solved in that time the senate could renew it for another six months and keep on renewing it until the crisis was resolved. In the case of Julius Caesar though, the senate made him dictator and renewed the office and eventually named him a perpetual dictator or a dictator for life.
Roman women had rights just about equal to men, but they still lived in a male dominated world. For example, a woman could not vote or run for public office. A woman, although she had the right to divorce, still had to have a male relative or guardian make the arrangements. A woman could only inherit a minimal amount from her husband or father. A woman could not join the army. Despite these restrictions, the Roman women had more equality with men than many of their ancient counterparts.
The Vestals of ancient Rome had no restrictions on their diet. They ate whatever was common at the time.
In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.
Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.Dictators were important in ancient Rome because they were appointed in times of crisis. Crisis is the key word. When there was a major crisis its solution was debated in the senate with all senators having the right to air their views. This could take days. (There were anywhere from five to six hundred senators, depending upon the time) So to avoid long drawn out, time consuming debates , the senate would vote to appoint a dictator with authority to solve the problem.
The Senate proposed a law, then voting assemblies cast their vote. In a different time of Ancient Rome, the Emperor proposed a law and the Senate either denied or passed it.
yes, and no. Ancient Rome had a senate and they were in charge for some time, but they soon got emperors. Some of the emperors, such as Julius Caesar, wanted to become King, but he was killed. After that, they just stuck with emperors.
The office of dictator in ancient Rome was usually only for six months. However if the problem was not solved in that time the senate could renew it for another six months and keep on renewing it until the crisis was resolved. In the case of Julius Caesar though, the senate made him dictator and renewed the office and eventually named him a perpetual dictator or a dictator for life.
The patricians were the aristocracy of ancient Rome. The name is derived from the term pater familias (father of the family/head of the household) and from the creation of the senate by Romulus, Rome's founder and first king. Romulus created a council of elders (senate is derived from senex, the Latin for old man) to act as the royal advisory body. He selected 100 pater familias from the leading clans of Rome at the time to seat in the senate. The members of these clans then called themselves patres (plural of pater) a term which implied that they were the fathers of the city.
If a senator chose to be active in politics, his job was to debate and vote on issues. His job during the period of the emperors was to advise and consent. At any time he could put up a proposal for a law and have it debated in the senate. He also acted as a kind of juror for treason trials of high ranking citizens.
4 years
Roman women had rights just about equal to men, but they still lived in a male dominated world. For example, a woman could not vote or run for public office. A woman, although she had the right to divorce, still had to have a male relative or guardian make the arrangements. A woman could only inherit a minimal amount from her husband or father. A woman could not join the army. Despite these restrictions, the Roman women had more equality with men than many of their ancient counterparts.
The Vestals of ancient Rome had no restrictions on their diet. They ate whatever was common at the time.
first of all, Rome is located in Italy, which is now an exciting place to spend your time at. Over 9,000 years ago, Rome was ruled by the Government which had the Senate, Assembly, Tribunes, Plebeians, Patricians, etc that you know. All this Government issues are called the Roman Democracy.poeple love Rome..................................................................................................
In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.In 620 BC Rome was ruled by the king Ancus Martius. Since the kings were selected by the senate at that time, there was no actual family that ruled Rome although there was undoubtedly family alliances.
Senators could pass Senatus Consultum to advise the Magistrate. In times of crisis, they could invoke Senatus Consultum ultimum, which allowed them to use any means necessary to solve the issue. Though the Roman Senate initially served only as an advisory board to the ruler during Rome's kingdom days, by the time of Rome's Middle Republic, the Senate was at the height of its power.