Ok, the basic idea of a nation-state is that a central government, the state, rules over a group of people who share a culture, the nation. Most of these nation-states had powerful national governments, because their people were united by nationalistic feelings. These powerful national governments were then able to do basically whatever they wanted, and since they had the authority to do so, they began expanding outward. But as Europe was already inhabited, this expansion took place in other parts of the world, namely Africa and the multitudes of islands in the Pacific and Indian Oceans.
i don't know the way that they are alike, but the absolute the ruler can legally do whatever he/she wants, but as the constitutional, the ruler is bound by the constitution and it's laws.
Absolute monarchies chances throughout these periods because social structure changed as well. As people's faith in religion grew, the Church felt they too had a sense of political power.
Oliver Cromwell, as Lord Protector was able to institute change in the power of an absolute monarch by establishing the people as the power in England.
Yes, the king who increased the power of the attendants at the expense of the nobility was often seen in the context of absolute monarchies, such as Louis XIV of France. He centralized authority by empowering royal officials and court attendants, diminishing the influence of the traditional nobility. This shift allowed him to exert greater control over the state while reducing the power of the aristocracy. Such actions were crucial in establishing a more centralized and efficient government.
A form of government in which the political authority exercises absolute and centralized control over all aspects of life.
The rise of absolute monarchies and the development of centralized nation-states in Europe were influenced by several key events, including the decline of feudalism, the consolidation of power by monarchs, and the impact of the Renaissance and Reformation. The weakening of noble power due to wars and the need for strong, centralized governance led monarchs to assert greater control over their territories. Additionally, the growth of trade and a burgeoning middle class provided financial support for monarchs, enabling them to strengthen their authority. These factors combined to facilitate the emergence of powerful, centralized states under absolute rulers.
Absolute monarchies served a societal need when they were instituted and were replaced when they were no longer able meet the new societal changes that arose in the pre modern era. The absolute monarchies were an improvement over the chaos that followed the fall of the Roman Empire and the subsequent dark ages. One need only compare the development of medieval France and that of the neighboring territories of the Holy Roman Empire to see the advantages of centralized power in restoring the conditions necessary for economic growth and the advancement of culture. The rise of civil society under the stability cultivated by the successful monarchies led to more complex societies with needs which could no longer be met by a single ruler. Some absolute monarchies transitioned into constitutional monarchies which continue to this day. Others resisted the transition in power leading to often violent revolutions which served their societies less well.
The Enlightenment harmed the efforts of absolute monarchies to maintain their power. The Enlightenment reflected a time of personal and spiritual development, emphasizing elements of personal power over state control.
Describe the decision-making role of citizens in countries that are dictatorships and in countries that are absolute monarchies.
Saudi Arabia
To completely control a society/people.
a French philosopher: Thomas Hobbes
Dictatorship
They both were absolute monarchies.
As of 5 August 2010, several nations continue to employ absolute monarchy as a system of government:BruneiOmanQatarSaudi ArabiaSwazilandVatican CityHowever, Vatican City can also be described as a theocracy.
i don't know the way that they are alike, but the absolute the ruler can legally do whatever he/she wants, but as the constitutional, the ruler is bound by the constitution and it's laws.
In an absolute monarchy ordinary people have to be uncomplaining, loyal and obedient subjects.