Imperialism had both positive and negative effects. Great Britain had captured and colonized most land in India and Africa. These places tried to defend but the British armies had stronger weapons. They tried to convert the places they captured, to Christianity. The British took advantage of the natives because they knew they could. Because the British were so harsh to the africans, they never fully recovered therefore causing them to become a third world country. While the Indians gained back land little by little and got stronger.
Western imperialism put Japan in a position where they were excluded from attaining the raw materials they required for economic progress.
Butt
Old imperialism, which occurred from the 15th to 19th centuries, was driven by the desire for resources, wealth, and power. It involved direct control and exploitation of colonies through military conquest. New imperialism, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, focused on economic dominance and spreading Western culture and values. It used economic and political influence to control colonies. The impacts of old imperialism were often more brutal and exploitative, leading to widespread suffering and loss of culture for colonized regions. New imperialism had a more subtle impact, with economic exploitation and cultural assimilation causing long-term effects on colonized societies.
The Anti-Imperialism League aimed to oppose the expansion of American influence and control over other countries. They believed in self-determination for nations and criticized the United States' imperialistic policies. The league's impact was limited, but it raised awareness about the negative consequences of imperialism and influenced public opinion on foreign policy.
The Anti-Imperialist League aimed to oppose the expansion of American imperialism and promote self-determination for colonized peoples. Their impact included raising awareness about the negative consequences of imperialism and influencing public opinion against U.S. colonial policies.
i dont know... hahahha
uyg
it didnt
Critics of British imperialism argued that it was morally unjust, as it often involved the exploitation and oppression of colonized peoples. They highlighted the destructive impact on local cultures, economies, and societies, arguing that imperialism perpetuated racial hierarchies and denied self-determination. Additionally, some critics pointed to the economic costs and political instability that could arise from maintaining an empire, suggesting that imperialism was ultimately detrimental to both the colonizers and the colonized.
Western imperialism put Japan in a position where they were excluded from attaining the raw materials they required for economic progress.
"Heart of Darkness" is considered postcolonial because it critiques the effects of European colonialism on African societies. The novella highlights themes of power, exploitation, and the psychological impact of imperialism on both colonizers and colonized peoples. Through its portrayal of the brutality and darkness inherent in colonialism, the story challenges dominant colonial narratives and exposes the dehumanizing nature of imperialism.
Butt
I'm afraid it did not, you can argue that the Age of Exploration helped to create imperialism in the form we know it today. Although imperialism has been around for thousands of years, it wasn't until the 1700's that imperialism really started to have an effect.
Old imperialism, which occurred from the 15th to 19th centuries, was driven by the desire for resources, wealth, and power. It involved direct control and exploitation of colonies through military conquest. New imperialism, in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, focused on economic dominance and spreading Western culture and values. It used economic and political influence to control colonies. The impacts of old imperialism were often more brutal and exploitative, leading to widespread suffering and loss of culture for colonized regions. New imperialism had a more subtle impact, with economic exploitation and cultural assimilation causing long-term effects on colonized societies.
they worked otut sales and put up buisnesses
This statement is generally not accurate. Industrial societies typically have a larger environmental impact due to their high levels of resource consumption and pollution. Nomadic societies often have sustainable practices that allow them to live in harmony with the environment, such as moving to new areas when resources are depleted.
Help to take control over more lands known as imperialism