answersLogoWhite

0

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about General History

What courts are the main trial courts of Louisiana?

The trial courts of Louisiana are District Courts, Juvenile Courts, Parish Courts, City Courts, Justice of the Peace Courts, Mayor's and Magistrate Courts, and some specialized courts in some parishes. There are District Courts and Justice of the Peace Courts in every parish; the other courts only exist in some parishes.Which court is the "main" court for your case depends on your location and type of case. District Courts can take any case, but generally won't take a case if it can be handled by a lower court. District Court criminal cases are usually felonies, and District Court civil cases are usually for higher dollar amounts.Which cases are actually handled by which courts also depends on which parish the case is in, so it can't be answered in this space. But the related link below has a good summary of Louisiana courts' jurisdiction, and you can then select a parish and check the websites for all the courts in that parish.


When did Mixed Courts of Egypt end?

Mixed Courts of Egypt ended in 1949.


What is the primary function of the US courts of appeals?

The primary function of the U.S. courts of appeals is to hear and dispose of the vast majority of cases appealed from the district courts.


Hated british courts in which juries were not allowed and defendants were assumed guilty?

Admiralty courts


Are courts and judges part of the judicial or executive branch?

The courts and the officers of the courts (lawyers, clerks, judges, and so forth) are all members of the judicial branch of government.

Related Questions

What statement about the federal court system is accurate?

Congress has the power to create new federal courts


What is an accurate statement about the federal court system?

Congress has the power to create new federal courts.


What has generally been the supreme courts attitude toward prior restraint?

Supreme Court decisions over the past 75 years clearly support the presumption of the unconstitutionality of prior restraint


Is a notarized statement accepted by the courts?

for what? anyway, not usually.


Which statement is not true about state supreme courts?

the ruling of state supreme courts are always the final judgment on a matter.


Why should judges exercise judicial restraint?

Judicial restraint is important because without it courts will be tempted to rewrite laws through interpretation rather than simply to confirm or reject the constitutionality of a law. When a court rejects the constitutionality of a law, it should not attempt to fix the problem, rather it should remand the matter back to Congress for revision. Unfortunately for justice, courts often fail to enact constitutionally mandated restraint.


Activist judges believes that the courts should?

Activist judges believe that the courts should play a more active role in policy making and be willing to strike down federal laws, whereas judges favoring restraint believe that the courts should defer to the elected branches of government.


Trial courts have jurisdiction over all offenses including felonies and appeals?

Not a true statement. Trial Courts do NOT hear appeals. That function is assigned to the Court of Appeals.


What are some differing views on the role of the courts in our society?

Differing views on the role of the courts in society often revolve around judicial activism versus judicial restraint. Proponents of judicial activism argue that courts should interpret laws broadly and protect individual rights, especially when legislative bodies fail to do so. In contrast, advocates of judicial restraint believe courts should defer to elected officials and uphold laws as written, limiting their role to interpreting rather than making policy. These perspectives influence debates on issues such as civil rights, social justice, and the balance of power among government branches.


Every criminal act can be prosecuted in both federal and state courts Is this statement true or false?

False.


Compare Judicial Restraint and Judicial Activism?

Judicial restraint is the theory that judges should limit their exercise of power and strike down laws only when they are obviously unconstitutional, and always follow precedents set by older courts. Judicial activism is the opposite view, and is sometimes meant to imply politically motivated judicial decisions.


Is this statement false most criminal trials take place in state courts?

The government does not sponsor clinical trials