The Supreme Court's position on prior restraint of the press is that it is unconstitutional. The Supreme Court went on to say it's a very serious issue and a total infringement of the rights of the press under the First Amendment.
The courts don't allow or prohibit ANYTHING - they simply interpret the existing law. Perhaps you are referring to the US Constitutional Amendment which protects the right of Free Speech?
no
freedom of speech
An arbitrator's decision and award can typically be appealed to the courts only in limited circumstances, such as if there was misconduct or bias on the part of the arbitrator, or if the decision violates public policy.
The Supreme Court's primary focus is to determine if a law is constitutional. To do this, it follows certain philosophies to help it come to a decision. These philosophies are loose or strict constructionism, judicial restraint and judicial activism.
majority opinion
all the court systems are interlinked, but the state courts make their own decision without input from federal courts
U.S. courts of appealThe actual answer to your question is none. No-one repeals decision of any courts. However, decisions of courts can be reversed. The Federal Courts of Appeals can reverse decisions of federal district courts. That's it.Added: And the US Supreme Court can over-rule the decision of ANY inferior court.
They review cases that has been decided in district courts, in appellate courts, they have only a judge taking a decision.
Hijknk
Hijknk
appelate court