The issue that divided them was that the federalist were in favor of a strong central government while the anti federalists were opposed to it.
The size and involvement of the federal government. The federalists wanted a strong federal government with a powerful executive, while the anti-federalists were worried that a strong fed and executive would place them back under the bondage of a tyrannical government. It gets more complicated and specific from here.
the debate to add the bill of rights
twerk team
During that time period, voting qualifications were a hotly contested topic. At the time, there was a simple rule: if you were a male, and owned property, you could vote. The Federalist and the Anti-Federalists both had opposing viewpoints on the issue. The Anti-Federalists, made up mostly of farmers and working men and led by Thomas Jefferson, wanted the qualifications to be lowered so that any male who could read could vote, thus making sure that the will of the people was reflected. The Federalists on the other hand, made up of well-to-do business owners and lead by Alexander Hamilton, wanted them increased so that only an elite group could vote, thus insuring that the vote was made by informed, intelligent people.
It is that t forgone affairs are to be felt with inpromtly due to certain budget regulations.
Whether a Bill of Rights was necessary to include in the Constitution.
The main disagreement was the issue of a strong federal government, supported by Federalists, or a weak federal government with strong state government or rights, which was supported by anti-federalists, hence the name. But more importantly, while Anti-Federalists strongly disagreed with a federal government they would concede to it if a Bill of Rights was attached, to protect the people from potential tyranny.
The Federalists played an important role in the ratification of the Constitution, because they were the ones that wrote it. Three of them, who were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, wrote a series of essays arguing why the Constitution should be ratified, by explaining the reason the Constitution was needed so badly, and the reason why it did not take away their liberty (one prevalent argument of those against the ratification of the Constitution, the Anti-federalists). These essays were published in newspapers, and everyone was thinking about the issue from reading them. These essays were put together into a collection called the Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers are the reason why the Constitution was ratified, other than their compromise to include a Bill of Rights as demanded by the Anti-Federalists.
i
i
The Federalists made a comprimise to issue a Bill of Rights into the Constitution to get enough support for the Constitution to be ratified. They agreed that when the first Congress was held, it would draft a Bill of Rights. The argument was a win for the Anti-Federalists. It was an important addition to the Constitution and has been a great importance in the protection of the basic rights of the American people.
fedrilism
It was also a debate about the issue of slavery.
I don't care to debate the issue with you.
The size and involvement of the federal government. The federalists wanted a strong federal government with a powerful executive, while the anti-federalists were worried that a strong fed and executive would place them back under the bondage of a tyrannical government. It gets more complicated and specific from here.
issue
food