answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The Federalists played an important role in the ratification of the Constitution, because they were the ones that wrote it. Three of them, who were Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay, wrote a series of essays arguing why the Constitution should be ratified, by explaining the reason the Constitution was needed so badly, and the reason why it did not take away their liberty (one prevalent argument of those against the ratification of the Constitution, the Anti-federalists). These essays were published in newspapers, and everyone was thinking about the issue from reading them. These essays were put together into a collection called the Federalist Papers. The Federalist Papers are the reason why the Constitution was ratified, other than their compromise to include a Bill of Rights as demanded by the Anti-Federalists.

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

7y ago

When it became clear that the American colonies needed a stronger central government, most of the members of the newly freed colonies understood that the Articles of Confederation were not suited to keep the colonies strong. The Federalists such as James Madison and Alexander Hamilton believed a stronger central government was required. The ensuing debate was between the Federalists seeking a more powerful Federal government debated the non-Federalist over how much power the new government would have.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

ciampaining with the support of washington and franklin

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: What role did the Federalists play in the debate over the ratification of the Constitution?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about U.S. History

Favored ratification of the constitution and favored a strong national government?

You would probably be best served to look up a list of prominent Federalists. The Federalists were almost always supporters of the Constitution, and always supporters of "big government" (a strong federal control over the States). Here are a few big names: •Washington (1st President) •Adams (2nd President) •Hamilton (Washington's cabinet)


How was the debate over the ratification of the constitution resolved?

The two thirds compromise was adapted to give the South more representatives in the House of Representatives. The compromise allowed the South to count two thirds of their slaves with the general population.


What is the meaning of federalist?

There were two definitions of Federalists. The first were the Federalists, and they were people who advocated ratification of the Constitution in 1787. Prominent Federalists of this kind include the 3 writers of the Federalist Papers (Hamilton, Madison, and Jay), created for the above purpose, Benjamin Franklin, and George Washington. The second kind of federalist refers to the Federalist Party, created in 1790 over increasing controversy over the policies of Alexander Hamilton. Prominent Federalists of this kind include Alexander Hamilton, the leader of the Federalist Party until his untimely death in 1804, John Adams, second president, and all 4 of John Adams' cabinet members. The first Federalists were only around as long as Constitutional ratification was debated, but the second Federalists, Federalist Party members, were around for most of the 1790s, but they splintered with the election of 1800 and finally collapsed with Alexander Hamilton's death via a duel.


what was true of federalists?

They believed the national government should be stronger than the states


What were the positions of each side toward ratification?

The debates over ratification of the Constitution represent the most important and intellectually sophisticated public debates in American history. On the one side, the supporters of the Constitution, or "Federalists," argued that the nation desperately needed a stronger national government to bring order, stability and unity to its efforts to find its way in an increasingly complicated world. Opponents of the Constitution, or "Antifederalists," countered that the governments of the states were strong enough to realize the objectives of each state. Any government that diminished the power of the states, as the new Constitution surely promised to do, would also diminish the ability of each state to meet the needs of its citizens. More dramatically, the Antifederalists argued that the new national government, far removed from the people, would be all to quick to compromise their rights and liberties in the name of establishing order and unity.A handful of men on each side of the debate became the central figures in an extensive public discussion about the proposed Constitution, publishing a series of widely-published and carefully read articles explaining their positions. James Madison, Alexander Hamilton and John Jay, writing under the pseudonym Publius, wrote dozens of articles supporting the Constitution which are now collectively referred to as The Federalist Papers. Articles written in response by George Mason, Elbridge Gerry and Patrick Henry are, appropriately, known as the Antifederalist Papers. While these writings are the best known and most widely read today, there were hundreds, even thousands of others who joined in the debates through public argument or speech-making and by writing articles, letters and pamphlets.

Related questions

How did the anti federalists lose the debate over ratification?

yes


Which of the two groups debating the constitution favored ratification?

Federalists And Antifederalists Fought Over The Ratification


Why did federalists and anti federalists clash over the ratification of the constitution?

Because the federalists wanted the constitution and the anti-Federalists didn't, because the anti-Federalists wanted a smaller government and were afraid the Constitution would take away their freedom.


Approximately how long did the debate over the ratification of the US constitution last?

The debate over the ratification of the US Constitution lasted from 1787 to 1788, spanning approximately one year.


How long did the debate over the ratification of the Constitution last?

1 year


Why did the anti-federalists lose the debate over ratification?

The Anti-Federalist lost due to the fact that they were unorganized.


How long did the debate over the ratification of the us constitution last?

1 year


During the struggle over ratification of the US constitution federalists and anti-federalists disagreed mainly over?

The federalists and the anti-federalists mainly disagreed over the amount of control over the states that the federal government would have. The anti-federalists wanted more independence for the states.


Where did the debate over the ratification of the new constitution take place?

It toke place in Philadelphia in 1787.


According to the chronology how long did the debate over the ratification of the US Constitution last?

one year


How did federalists and the Antifederalists try to convince people to take their sides in the debate over the constitution?

Propaganda


How did the federalists and the antifederalists try to convince people to take their sides in the debate over constitution?

Propaganda