0
Diocletian did not literally split the Roman Empire into four part. He subdivided it into four main administrative areas, the praetorian prefectures.Diocletian stressed that the empire was indivisible. He also doubled the number of Roman provinces and grouped them into twelve dioceses which came under the praetorian prefectures.
Diocletian created the tetrarchy (rule by four) and subdivided the Empire into four main administrative units, the praetorian prefectures. He appointed fellow general Maximian as co-emperor in 285. Maximian took overall control of the western part of the empire, while Diocletian took overall control of the eastern part. Then these two men became senior emperors (Augusti) with the creation, in 293, of two junior emperors (Caesars) who were subordinates of the Augusti. The Caesars Constantius and Galerius.. One of the tasks of the Caesars was to defend the troubled frontiers along the rivers Rhine and Danube respectively, which had been under constant attack from outside the empire.
Each of the four emperors took charge of a praetorian prefecture.Galliae (Gaul, Britannia and Hispania), was headed by Constantius; Italia et Africa (Italy, Switzerland and north-western Africa) was headed by Maximian; Illyricum (the Balkan Peninsula except for Thracia, in modern eastern Bulgaria) was headed by Galerius; and Oriens (Thracia, the Roman territories in Asia, Egypt and eastern Libya) was headed by Diocletian. Galliae and Italia et Africa were in the west. Illyricum and Oriens were in the east.
This reform had several aims:
1) The bad experience of recent sole emperors suggested to Diocletian that sole emperors were vulnerable and that co-emperorship made power more secure.
2) Diocletian could not create an informal co-emperorship with a son as previous emperors had done because he was hairless; he had a daughter and no sons. Therefore, he needed a trusted co-ruler from outside the family and had to create a formal co-emperorship.
3) There was a need to improve imperial control over the empire. There had been conflict between powerful men many provinces of the empire and also attempts at usurpation in some areas. Diocletian shared controlling the provinces with three men.
4) There was also a need to improve the efficiency of the defence of the vast frontiers of the empire. He entrusted the defence of the most troubled tracts of the frontiers to the Caesars.
The tetrarchy begun to unravel after Diocletian and Maximian abdicated in 305 and eventually fell as the emperor started to fight each other over power and Constantine the Great emerged as sole emperor in 327.
What else can I help you with?
When did empire split into four sections?
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
Was the downfall of the Roman Empire caused by it's size or it's people?
There were several reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. One of the principle reasons was the split of the Empire into two parts which began with Diocletian. The true answer to the question is still up for debate but I am a historian and the down and dirty answer is this: The Roman government got complaisant and stopped caring about expanding and governing the Empire. This allowed outside forces to put pressure on the Empire and eventually invade and conquer Rome.
How many parts was the Mongol Empire split into after the death of Genghis Khan?
either , 2, 4, 6 or 7
What steps did Diocletian take to solve the empires problems?
Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.
The crisis that afflicted the Roman empire after the pax Roman ended?
The Roman Empire actually split into two parts. Well Diocletian realized that this region was two much for one man, so he split it into 4 parts (total) which is referred to as a tetrarch. The western empire then died (324-476) and the rest lasted until 1453.
Who split the empire into two?
If you are referring to the Roman Empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
When did empire split into four sections?
If you are referring to the Roman empire, no one split it into two pieces or two parts. The emperor Diocletian divided it into four parts which was called the tetrarchy. It was later historians that gave the false impression that the empire was split.
Which emperor willed on his life that the Roman empire should be split into two parts?
No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.No emperor declared that the empire should be split into two parts. It was historians that made the distinction in order to avoid confusion.
What two parts did the holy roman empire split into?
eastern and western
Who split the Roman Empire in two parts in AD 330?
Constantine
Who split Roman Empire into two parts in AD 330?
Constantine
Was the downfall of the Roman Empire caused by it's size or it's people?
There were several reasons for the fall of the Roman Empire. One of the principle reasons was the split of the Empire into two parts which began with Diocletian. The true answer to the question is still up for debate but I am a historian and the down and dirty answer is this: The Roman government got complaisant and stopped caring about expanding and governing the Empire. This allowed outside forces to put pressure on the Empire and eventually invade and conquer Rome.
How was Alexander's empire split after his death?
Amongst his generals who took parts of it and formed what we call the Hellenistic Kingdoms.
Who split the roman empire into two parts in ad 330?
Constantine split the Roman Empire into the Holy Roman Empire and the Byzantine Empire. It should be noted however that the emperor Diocletian (284-305 AD ) made this easier as he was the first to divide the empire into two parts, a western and eastern empire to be ruled separately. The emperors who followed Constantine, Julian and Theodosius I, made permanent the division of the Roman Empire into an eastern and western half.
How many parts was the Mongol Empire split into after the death of Genghis Khan?
either , 2, 4, 6 or 7
What steps did Diocletian take to solve the empires problems?
Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.Diocletian split or divided the empire in order to make it easier to govern, or so he thought.
From what empire did it split?
Well you have not told us which Empire you are asking about or what "it" was. However, as the British Empire was the largest in history, it is probable that whatever "it" was it split from the British Empire.
