0
Who came up with the idea of creating a new system of government rather than trying to fix the Articles of Confederations?
The idea of creating a new system of government instead of amending the Articles of Confederation was largely championed by Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. At the Constitutional Convention in 1787, they argued for a stronger federal government to address the weaknesses of the Articles. Their advocacy led to the drafting of the U.S. Constitution, which established a more robust and effective government framework.
What else can I help you with?
The Constitutional Convention decided to write a new constitution rather than amend the Articles of Confederation What was the main weakness of the Articles of Confederation that led to its downfal?
It did not give the central government enough power
What were the articles more like rather than a government?
The articles were more like a loose association of states rather than a cohesive government. They created a framework where each state retained significant autonomy and power, leading to a lack of centralized authority. This resulted in difficulties in governance, such as challenges in taxation and interstate relations, ultimately highlighting the weaknesses of the system.
Did the articles of Confederation only create one branch of Government?
The Articles of Confederation created only a legislative branch of government as to prevent Congress from gaining full control. Their method of doing this was creating a "firm league of friendship" rather than a strong central government and allowing states to retain the most power. In doing so, however, many feared that some states would retain too much power and dominate others in the national government. The Articles of Confederation dealt with these fears by giving each state only one vote regardless of its population and ordaining that on important issues, nine states would have to agree in order to come to a solution.
Who retained most government power under under the articles of confederation states Or national government?
Under the Articles of Confederation, most government power was retained by the states rather than the national government. The Articles established a weak central government that lacked the authority to impose taxes or regulate commerce effectively, which led to significant challenges in governance. This decentralization of power resulted in states having significant autonomy, often leading to conflicts and inconsistencies in laws and policies across the nation. Ultimately, the limitations of the Articles prompted the drafting of the U.S. Constitution to create a stronger federal framework.
After half a century the founding fathers realized the form of government created by the articles of confederation wasint working as they had hoped?
They didn't wait 50 years to change, but rather it was March of 1881 it was written and the constitution was in 1889.
The Constitutional Convention decided to write a new constitution rather than amend the Articles of Confederation What was the main weakness of the Articles of Confederation that led to its downfal?
It did not give the central government enough power
How is power distributed in a con federal government?
In a confederal government, power is primarily held by individual states or regional entities, which retain significant autonomy and authority. The central government, if it exists, has limited powers and relies on the consent and cooperation of the member states to function effectively. This distribution often leads to a weaker central authority, as states can choose to ignore or reject central mandates, resulting in a loose alliance rather than a strong national government. Examples of confederations include the Articles of Confederation in the United States and the European Union in its early stages.
The Constitutional Convention decided to write a new constitution rather than amend the Articles of Confederation. What was the main weakness of the Articles of Confederation that led to its downfal?
It did not give the central government enough power
What were the articles more like rather than a government?
The articles were more like a loose association of states rather than a cohesive government. They created a framework where each state retained significant autonomy and power, leading to a lack of centralized authority. This resulted in difficulties in governance, such as challenges in taxation and interstate relations, ultimately highlighting the weaknesses of the system.
Did the articles of Confederation only create one branch of Government?
The Articles of Confederation created only a legislative branch of government as to prevent Congress from gaining full control. Their method of doing this was creating a "firm league of friendship" rather than a strong central government and allowing states to retain the most power. In doing so, however, many feared that some states would retain too much power and dominate others in the national government. The Articles of Confederation dealt with these fears by giving each state only one vote regardless of its population and ordaining that on important issues, nine states would have to agree in order to come to a solution.
Who retained most government power under under the articles of confederation states Or national government?
Under the Articles of Confederation, most government power was retained by the states rather than the national government. The Articles established a weak central government that lacked the authority to impose taxes or regulate commerce effectively, which led to significant challenges in governance. This decentralization of power resulted in states having significant autonomy, often leading to conflicts and inconsistencies in laws and policies across the nation. Ultimately, the limitations of the Articles prompted the drafting of the U.S. Constitution to create a stronger federal framework.
How did the articles of confederation influence the us?
It was the first set of rules governing the early years of the United States It had flaws that cried out to be remedied in a revised scheme, that turned out to be the Constitution. The Articles had both a weak executive and a very weak national government. Rather than the Federal system which developed under the Constitution, the Articles left mostpower in the hands of the states who retained their rights to armies and taxation. The power did not actually reside in "the people" but, rather, in the states who could have their own laws and taxes and there wasn't much the central government could do about it under the Articles. Although the Constitution was careful to give powers to the Federal government, there was an amendment required by compromise that insisted that all rights not specifically granted to the Federal government was reserved to the states. Nevertheless, the Constitution provided much more of a balance and, indeed, enhancement of the power of the central (Federal) government.
Would you rather have the constitution or Articles of Confederation?
The US would not have survived under the Articles of Confederation. They didn't give the Federal government enough authority to govern a sovereign country. The UK and possibly other nations would have eventually recolonized the States, one by one.
Why is the australian government spending too much money and creating more debt which australia can't pay back?
The Majority of Australians Don't Want Cuts to Government Services Australians would rather Pay Higher Taxes.
Should journal articles be italicized or quoted in academic writing?
In academic writing, journal articles should be italicized rather than quoted.
What did all of the Framers of the Constitution agree to before the convention?
to work in secret
After half a century the founding fathers realized the form of government created by the articles of confederation wasint working as they had hoped?
They didn't wait 50 years to change, but rather it was March of 1881 it was written and the constitution was in 1889.
