Peasants were treated like they were trash. Just thrown out there, not a big deal. They didnt have anything to eat
No, he fought at least 65 wars in his life.
they grew worse.
Catherine the Great's decision to free the serfs in Russia during her reign had a significant impact on the social and economic landscape. The emancipation of the serfs led to increased social mobility and improved living conditions for many peasants. However, it also caused economic challenges for the nobility who relied on serf labor for their estates. Overall, the decision contributed to the modernization of Russia's economy and society.
Knights were not simply allowed to kill peasants. I know of no secular laws that allowed this, and Church law certainly would not, unless the peasants were guilty of some crime. A country that gave knights free reign to do such a thing would have been at odds with the Church very quickly. It was allowed in ancient Rome, but even in ancient Rome, the laws had changed.
They stayed about the same.
Peasants were treated like they were trash. Just thrown out there, not a big deal. They didnt have anything to eat
No, he fought at least 65 wars in his life.
Bo one. Not the king, the nobles, the clerics, the politicians or the peasants.
they grew worse.
The ancient Egyptians were quite prosperous under the reign of Rames II.Under the reign of the ruthless despot, the peasants were subjected to tremendous hardship, unspeakable torture and significant loss of life.
No, he improved the food supply and ended hyperinflation.
expanding the empire and extending trade routes to India and China.
Boris Godunov. A famine plagued Russia during his reign and as the peasants tried to leave the land, Godunov forced them to stay.
Catherine the Great's decision to free the serfs in Russia during her reign had a significant impact on the social and economic landscape. The emancipation of the serfs led to increased social mobility and improved living conditions for many peasants. However, it also caused economic challenges for the nobility who relied on serf labor for their estates. Overall, the decision contributed to the modernization of Russia's economy and society.
They (meaning the majority) were supportive. Royalists were in opposition, the Catholic clergy opposed him, many in the military and politics considered him to be a tyrant. Hardcore Republicans doubted his allegiance to their cause. For most of his rule he remained the subject of assassination plots. The economy had improved under his leadership and food was available. The Reign of Terror was over and the peasants had never had it so good.
Peasants during Tsar Nicholas II's reign were generally treated poorly. They faced harsh conditions, poverty, and oppression under his rule. The failure to address their needs and grievances contributed to the discontent that eventually led to the Russian Revolution.