It depends on which version of slavery you mean. Maybe the Asians who forced THEIR enemies into slavery? I suggest most people only know about the slavery that involved African-Americans in THIS country. It also went on throughout Europe but became unacceptable before the U.S. outlawed the practice. Recognize that slaves were brought here by Dutch traders. The Dutch wanted to do business in Africa, but there weren't many things that they could use from the Africans, so they traded goods for slaves. Africans would round up their enemies and trade them to the Dutch traders for trinkets. Many of the Africans were planning to kill their enemies, but instead they decided that they could trade them away, never have to deal with them again and get some goods in the process. The South (U.S) was one of the last places that used slave labor. Other parts of the world had correctly decided that it was both inhumane and unprofitable. The sountern plantation owners couldn't imagine a way to work their crops without slave labor, so they resisted the pressure from the north to do away with slavery.
AnswerBut, the US was not the last place to have slavery. What about the Soviet Gulags, Nazi concentration camps, the Japanese occupation of Manchuria. And it may also still be practiced in some parts of Africa and Asia.In the 1800's, most slaves were owned by plantation owners
He did not have any slaves
Yo mama owned slaves.
William Penn had three slaves that he owned
It was calculated that in the South in 1860, compared to a global population of about 8 million white and 200,000 free blacks, only 1,6 million where slave holders, of which: 1,4 million owned 1 to 10 slaves, 300,000 owned 11 to 20 slaves, 200,000 owned owned more than 20 slaves.
how many members of congress owned slaves how many members of congress owned slaves
Of all the slaves owned forty-nine percent owned fewer than 5 slaves. Only five percent of Southern whites lived in a home that owned slaves. Which equals out to twenty-five percent of whites owned slaves.
6,100,000 Southern people owned no slaves.
No, it is not. In the South there were 7,8 millions of whites and 200,000 free blacks, of which: 6,100,000 owned no slaves, 1,400,000 owned from 1 up to 10 slaves, 300,000 owned from 10 up to 20 slaves and 200,000 owned more than 20 slaves.
In 1860, the South had a population of 8,000,000 of whites and free blacks (200,000) of which: 6,100,000 owned no slaves, 1,400,000 owned form 1 to 10 slaves, 300,000 owned from 11 to 20 slaves, 200,000 owned more than 20 slaves.
In the 1800's, most slaves were owned by plantation owners
In 1860, the South had a population of 8,000,000 of whites and free blacks (200,000) of which:6,100,000 owned no slaves,1,400,000 owned from 1 to 10 slaves,300,000 owned from 11 to 20 slaves,200,000 owned more than 20 slaves.Read more: In_1860_only_25_percent_of_southern_white_families_owned_slaves
In 1860, about 32% of Southern families owned slaves, but the total percentage of the population in the South that owned slaves was around 25%. This means that a significant portion of the Southern population did not own slaves.
In 1860, around 25% of the Southern population owned slaves.
In 1860, around 25% of Arkansas families owned slaves.
In 1860, about 12 of Republicans in the United States owned slaves.
The Cherokee Indians did not practice slavery. The Cherokee did have people that owned slaves, many did, in fact. Also, Choctaw and Seminole owned slaves, as did a few other tribes.