answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

No. The term "Empire" only applies to Rome between the periods 44BC - 1453 AD. It was, however, a republic, for 500 years before 44BC, and did control several territories during that time, with an area of 1,950,000 km2 (752,899 sq mi).

If you look up the definition of "empire" in the dictionary, you will find that Rome actually was an empire in 133 BC. There is a mistaken belief that the empire began with Augustus. Historians never refer to the reign of Augustus and those after him as the empire, they use the proper name, the principate.

User Avatar

Wiki User

12y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Was Rome a empire in 133 BC?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about History of Western Civilization

Who was the leader of Rome in 133 BC?

There was no Roman Empire in 200 BC, in those days Rome was a Republic ruled by the Senate


What three cities were part of the roman empire in 44 BC?

In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.In 44 BC there were may cities that were a part of the Roman empire. Rome was number one as it was the capital, but there was also Antioch and Athens for two more.


Who was Roman Emperor in 586 BC?

Rome was not an Empire a that period in time, therefore there was no Emperor.In 586 BC Rome was ruled by King Tarquin I (Lucius Tarquinius Priscus)


Where was the roman empire located in 753 BC?

There was no Roman empire in 753 BC. That is the traditional date of the founding of the city of Rome. It was not until roughly 200 years later that the little city-state grew into an empire.


How many provinces of Rome were there in 133 BC?

The number of provinces of the Roman Empire varied over time. Under the Republic there number of provinces reached 15. Under the period of the Principate (from the rule of Augustus to that of Numerian, 27 BC to 284 AD) the number had reached 39. Emperor Diocletian (ruled 285-305 AD) increased the number to 122 by subdividing the existing provinces. Constantine the great (ruled 324 to 337 AD) reduced thenumberslightly. There were also changes in the structure and number of the provinces in the late Empire.

Related questions

Who was the leader of Rome in 133 BC?

There was no Roman Empire in 200 BC, in those days Rome was a Republic ruled by the Senate


What year was Cleopatra summoned to Rome?

Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.Cleopatra was summoned to Rome in 46 BC. This was in order to formally be enrolled as an ally of Rome and to sort out the details. She was again in Rome in 44 BC. It is thought that she needed to be there as the senate was considering a repartition of the empire and it could have effects on Egypt.


What lands did Rome conquer to become the power in the Mediterranean?

Rome first started as a city, and then they conquered all of what is now Italy. In 133 BC, the empire consisted of Gaul, the Iberian Peninsula, and Greece. In AD 117, the empire consisted of Northern Africa, Egypt, central Europe, Britain, and all of modern day Turkey, the greatest extent of the empire. Basically, the Roman Empire conquered lands all around the Mediterranean Sea.


What kingdoms were created out of Alexander's empire after his death?

PtolemaicKingdom: Established 305 BC end it 30 BCSeleucid Empire: Established 312 BC end it 63 BCKingdom of Pergamon: Established 282 BC end it 133 BC


When was the empire Claudius born?

in 10 BC in ancient rome


What happened in 27 bc in rome?

Roman Empire Established


What tree kingdoms were created out of alexander's empire after his death?

PtolemaicKingdom: Established 305 BC end it 30 BCSeleucid Empire: Established 312 BC end it 63 BCKingdom of Pergamon: Established 282 BC end it 133 BC


Rome conquered what empire in 202 bc?

Carthaginians


How did rome change from a republic to an empire?

Rome was an empire under the Republican form of government. The republican form of government collapsed due to civil wars and political infighting. After the battle of Actium, Rome had the one man rule of an emperor, but the empire itself had already been firmly established.


What new empire was growing in power during the 100 bc?

rome


By 133 BC corruption in Rome was widespread and the time was ripe for reform The leader who arrived on the scene was?

Julius Caesar


What territory did rome control by 133 BC?

Asia minor Spain Greece France Britain and north amrica