Direct rule was commonly implemented by European powers in colonies where they maintained tight control over governance, such as in French West Africa and the Congo under Belgium. Indirect rule, on the other hand, was utilized by the British in places like Nigeria and India, where local rulers were retained to administer day-to-day governance while still under British oversight. This system was often seen as a way to reduce administrative costs and maintain stability by co-opting local elites.
indirect rule
Direct rule refers direct control as regards administration whereas indirect rule means self-governing.
Angola was under direct rule by Portugal until it gained independence in 1975.
Boer republics were under direct rule
Signapore colonizers used indirect rule. :)
indirect
direct
direct pooop
with direct rule the colonizing established a completely new governmental administration for its colony.under indirect rule the colonizing country ruled through traditional local leaders.
direct democracy is when each person rules and indirect is when people vote for people who rule.
Direct rule involves the colonial power governing the colony directly through its own officials and institutions, while indirect rule involves governing through local leaders and existing tribal structures. Direct rule is more centralized and involves greater control by the colonial power, while indirect rule allows for more local autonomy and collaboration with indigenous authorities.
No. The other European nations that were colonizing Europe were practicing direct rule whereas the English practiced indirect rule.