0
Describe the battle for ratification between federalists and anti-federalists using the arguments made in the federalist papers No 51 and 78?
The battle for ratification between Federalists and Anti-Federalists centered on the balance of power and the protection of individual rights. In Federalist No. 51, James Madison argued for the necessity of checks and balances within government to prevent tyranny and ensure that each branch would be independent while still accountable to the people. Meanwhile, Federalist No. 78, authored by Alexander Hamilton, emphasized the importance of an independent judiciary as a safeguard against legislative overreach, reinforcing the protection of constitutional rights. The Anti-Federalists, however, remained concerned that such a strong federal structure would endanger individual liberties, arguing for the need for explicit protections in the form of a Bill of Rights.
What else can I help you with?
What 3 main arguments of the Federalists and the Anti- Federalist?
they supported the right to tax the country, the ratification of the constitution, and they supported a strong central [federal] government
Compare the arguments for and against the Constitution made by the Federalists and Antifederalists during the struggle over ratification?
The main agreements between the antifederalist and the federalist were about the bill of rights and the need for a government. The antifederalist demanded to have a bill of rights because it can explain the ideals described in the Declaration of Independence better than the Constitution because the bill of rights gives us freedom of press, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion. Also, the federalist felt like it was important to have a government. They both disagreed. This is right luv
The federalists or the antifederalists had the more valid arguments?
There is no doubt that the Anti-Federalist had some very valid arguments but in many ways, their principles seemed to be flawed. The Anti-Federalists believed that the Constitution was an attempt to fuse the government into one nation and for them this would undermine any authority the states had. The contention of this argument was on the basis that, "there was an inherent connection between the states and the preservation of individual liberty, which is the end of any legitimate government.
What arguments did the the federalists make to gain approval of the Constitution?
The Federalist argued that the constitution needed to be ratified in order to correct the issues of the Articles of Confederation. The Federalist focused their arguments on the benefits of a national government.
What arguments did the federalists make to support ratification of the Constitution?
The federalists made a number of arguments to support the ratification of the constitution. They preferred a strong national government since they believed that if the states had too much power it would result into so many other confederacy governments within the states.
What basic arguments did the federalist use to support ratification?
to have one big power and little groups of power
What strategies made the federalist arguments of the constitution successful?
promise of a bill of rights and compromise with anti-federalists
What arguments did the federalists publish in reply to these fears?
In order to know what arguments the Federalist published in reply to certain fears more information is needed such as what their fears were.
What arguments did federalists publish in reply to these fears?
In order to know what arguments the Federalist published in reply to certain fears more information is needed such as what their fears were.
Why was john jay important to the ratification battle?
John Jay played a crucial role in the ratification battle of the U.S. Constitution by co-authoring the Federalist Papers alongside Alexander Hamilton and James Madison. His writings helped articulate the benefits of a strong central government and countered the arguments of Anti-Federalists. Additionally, Jay's prominence as a respected statesman and his advocacy for the Constitution lent credibility to the Federalist cause, ultimately aiding in securing the necessary support for ratification.
What is the significance of the Ferderalists Papers?
The Federalist Papers, written by James Madison, John Jay, and Alexander Hamilton were arguments for the ratification of the new Constitution. They com batted the "antifederalists", who complained that the new draft emphasized too much power on the central government and gave the states too little power.
What major arguments did the anti Federalist offer in opposition to ratification of the constitution?
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
