0
The Founders thought that common good was better than individual rights. They thought that because common good helps more than a few people. They thought the government should serve the majority of the people. The Founders tried to make common good one of the main purposes in the 1700's. Some of the Founders like Patrick Henry feared a strong national government. They worried that a strong government would only serve certain groups and couldn't be stopped just like their former king. The Founders' ideas on the common good are still used in the present day. In a argument between the Chicago government and a citizen, Morales, the government tried to do what the Founders wanted government to do. Morales said that loitering laws was violating the right to talk with peers. The Chicago government said loitering was and act of gangs and it disturbed the public. In the end of the argument Morales won.
The Founders liked the Roman Republic. In the Roman Republic the people ruled themselves. One of the governments' purposes was to serve every citizen. The Romans would hire representative when a community got to big. These representatives would represent the communities in government.
What else can I help you with?
Which did the founders think was more important the common good or individual rights?
The Founders thought that the common good was more important than the individual rights because for example: If there were a bunch of people in the movie theater, and one person randomly yelled, "FIRE!," that would be for the individual rights, not the common good. Because what if somebody who heard that person yell "FIRE" spilled their drink and tripped on an ice cube, that would definitely not be good for the common good. PEACE, LOVE, and HAPPINESS!!!!!
What is the most protected by the US Constitution common good or individual rights?
Individual rights are protected by the US Constitution.
What do you think is most important the common good or individual rights?
The balance between the common good and individual rights is crucial for a functioning society. While individual rights protect personal freedoms and dignity, prioritizing the common good can ensure the welfare and safety of the community as a whole. Ultimately, a harmonious society thrives when both aspects are respected and integrated, allowing for personal autonomy while fostering a sense of collective responsibility. Thus, neither can be deemed more important than the other; their interplay is what sustains social cohesion.
Have there been times when individual rights and the common good were in conflict?
yes
What might be the consequences to individual and society of too great an emphasis on the common good at the expense of individual rights?
There has to be both a consideration for the common good and individual rights. To have a government meet the needs of all citizens it must consider the common good of the society. To only address individual needs would mean that some citizens are left out of the political process.
Which did the founding fathers think was more importand the common good or individual rights?
The founders thought common good was more important because it helped more than one person.
What responcibilities if any do citizens have for seeing that individual rights are protected and the common good is promoted?
One of the responsibilities of citizens for protecing rights and promiting the common good is to always call 911.
What conflicts arise in a society with both individual rights and the common good?
if you commit crimes and do not respect enforcement laws also when you are not respecting other people.
Does the principles of the constitution include unlimited government and individual rights over common good?
No, the principles of the Constitution do not support unlimited government; rather, they establish a system of limited government designed to protect individual rights while promoting the common good. The Constitution balances individual rights with the needs of society, ensuring that personal freedoms are safeguarded without allowing individuals to infringe upon the rights of others. This framework aims to create a just society where both individual liberties and the common good are respected.
Have there been times when individual rights and the common good were conflict?
Yes, when you want something, but the whole family wants something else. For example, if you want pepperoni pizza, but the whole family ordered cheese pizza, then it's a problem. The family is the "common good" and you are the "individual rights".
What Rights of an individual vs overall society?
Individual rights are the inherent freedoms and liberties that each person possesses, such as freedom of speech, religion, and privacy. These rights are essential for protecting personal autonomy and dignity. On the other hand, societal rights are collective interests and values that promote the common good and well-being of the community, which may sometimes require limitations on individual rights to ensure public order and safety. Balancing individual rights with societal rights is a complex and ongoing process that involves weighing competing values and priorities to maintain a harmonious and just society.
What did the founders think was more important the common good or the individual rights?
The individual. The rights of the individual were paramount to the founders because all violations of a strong centralized government would be restricted by the protected rights of the individual. JFK "the rights of all men are diminished when the rights of one man are threatened." Everyone should understand the dangers of a strong centralized government and the risks to liberty it would present. Look at the number of laws passed by our national congress in ever increasing numbers since 1940.
