i am not certain how you are defining the term "lega;." However, a private corporation can set its own company policy as long as it is not anti-discriminatory, or violating any state or federal regulations, etc. I believe it is perfectly legitimate and not an uncommon practice for a company to require employees to use a corporate card for business expenses. What I don't understand is your objection to it.
I object to being forced to use any process that exposes my purchasing history, credit history, or is being used for monitoring purposes. In this case, the company forces employees to use a sponsored card but is not responsible for the purchases. They monitor purchases and credit history. I believe this is an intrusion into personal privacy.
I am trying to understand this question better before I answer.
What is the specific situation:
A. The employer is requiring the employee to apply for a corporate credit card (and have the employee be the responsible party for the charges) or
B. The company is providing the employee with a corporate credit card (where the company is the responsible party for the charges).
I don't know if A is legal or how common this circumstance is. B is legal and is fairly common.
I am trying to understand this question better before I answer.
What is the specific situation:
A. The employer is requiring the employee to apply for a corporate credit card (and have the employee be the responsible party for the charges) or
B. The company is providing the employee with a corporate credit card (where the company is the responsible party for the charges).
I don't know if A is legal or how common this circumstance is. B is legal and is fairly common.
Generally, an employer cannot legally require an employee to pay for a company retreat. Such costs are typically considered business expenses that the employer should cover. However, if the retreat is optional and employees choose to participate voluntarily, an employer might request a contribution. It's essential for employers to communicate clearly about any associated costs and the nature of participation.
YES
An employer cannot interfere in the private life of their employee. They shouldn't even know about an employee's parking citations.
Yes this would be the employers choice.
sometimes
Yes, they can. It is possible that the training expenses would be tax deductible. You would need to check with a tax professional regarding that aspect of course. Otherwise, payment should be made on a 60-40 or 50-50 basis where in 60% will be paid by your employer and the remaining is to be paid by the employee.
No employer can require things being done with or without pay. It is against the labor laws which are given by the federal government.
Yes if the employer is claiming the credit the amount of the medical insurance premium that the employer is paying on behalf of the employee will be included on the W-2 form to inform the employee of the amount that the employer is paying for the employee.
An employer can generally require employees to travel for work as long as it is within the scope of their job duties and is considered reasonable. There are no specific legal limits on how far an employer can require an employee to travel, but factors such as the nature of the job, the employee's contract, and any applicable labor laws may impact the extent of travel required.
Legally, though local laws may vary, the employer can require the employee to report to work in a uniform without providing any assistance to the employee to acquire that uniform. Ethics of this situation are debatable. Ultimately, either you want to work there or you don't.
No one anywhere can require you to sign anything. Doing so would invalidate your signature. It must be voluntary.
If your employer require you to purchase life insurance and you are share a part of the total premia, please bear in mind that the ultimate purpose is the benefit of the employee. So the good intention has to be supported with equal contribution.