Sufficient probable cause and evidence to place the defendant inside the location which was burglarized.
No, an IP address alone is not sufficient evidence to convict someone of a crime. Additional evidence is typically needed to establish a connection between the IP address and the individual responsible for the crime.
In a court of law, the number of witnesses needed to convict someone varies depending on the case and the evidence presented. Generally, there is no specific number of witnesses required for a conviction. The decision to convict someone is based on the strength of the evidence and whether it proves the guilt of the accused beyond a reasonable doubt.
Anything that can legally be admitted that would convince a juror that someone has committed a crime.
Math started when someone needed to document trade transactions. There is a lot of evidence which says that the Sumerians were the first to use math.
Enough evidence is needed to convince a jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the person committed the homicide.
Clarification needed: evidence for what? What proposition are you trying to support?
The lawyer needed more evidence from the shooting to help his client.
A confession alone is not always enough to convict someone of a crime. Other evidence, such as physical evidence or witness testimony, is typically needed to corroborate the confession and prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Confessions can be challenged in court if they are obtained improperly or under duress.
No, it isn't, but if it's available it better be used. It can prove scientifically conclusively that a person did, or did not, commit the offense.
More information is needed. If the wife knows where the husband/fugitive is hiding and she can be locate him, but law enforcement can not, she could be charged with aiding and abetting.
Evidence to support the argument is needed for a sound argument.