0
it is cheaper for corporations to bribe stae legislators than congressmen.
It is easier to black mail states with job losses and factory closures to gain regulatory and tax consessions.
States are "incubators for innovation" if left alone.
States can practice cut throat competition with tax and reguatory policies to lure business from one state to another
What else can I help you with?
What was the basic issue in the nullification argument?
states rights
What famous southern leader first used the states rights argument to defend the south?
John Calhoun
Which argument would supporters of selective incorporation most likely make?
all protections in the bill of rights should apply to the states
What were Southerners argument of state rights?
Southerners argued for states' rights primarily to defend their autonomy against federal intervention, particularly regarding issues like slavery and economic policies. They believed that individual states should have the authority to govern themselves without federal oversight, asserting that this was essential for preserving their way of life and regional interests. This belief was rooted in the Constitution, which they interpreted as granting states significant powers. Ultimately, the argument for states' rights became a central justification for secession and the Confederacy during the Civil War.
What ended the states rights controversy?
The states' rights controversy was largely resolved by the Civil War and the subsequent passage of the 14th and 15th Amendments, which reinforced federal authority over states in matters of civil rights and liberties. The war itself highlighted the limitations of states' rights when it came to issues such as slavery and union preservation. Additionally, the Supreme Court's decisions during the Reconstruction Era further established federal supremacy over state laws, effectively diminishing the states' rights argument in the context of civil rights.
What is a example of a persuasive argument?
The Bill of Rights.
What is an argument used by those who favor states' rights?
People who favor states' rights feel that state governments can serve their people better than the national government can. State governments, they argue, should be able to fit laws and programs to the particular needs of their citizens.
A major argument against ratification of the constitution was the absence of?
The major argument was the absence of a bill of rights in the Constitution
As a persuasive document what is Jefferson's main argument?
Jefferson's main argument is that men are given certain rights by God. The British were stomping on those rights by unfair taxation.
What is the controversy between states' rights and the exercise of national power?
States' Rights is the theory that state and local government's actions and laws in dealing with social and economic problems are supreme to federal actions and laws. The theory goes back to the founding of our nation. Jefferson and Madison advocated states' rights in the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions. John C. Calhoun's Theory of Nullification, the South's justification for declaring independence from the US, also advocates states' rights. The argument of the States' Rights theory is that the Constitution is a compact between states, not between people. The states created the national government and gave it only limited power. States' Rights supporters believe that the state is closest to the citizen and can better reflect their wishes.
What was the main argument in favor of Bill of Rights?
The main argument that was made in favor of the Bill of Rights was that it would guard against the emergence of a tyrannical government. The anti-Federalists, in particular, fought to have the Bill of Rights included in the Constitution.
What do we call the argument that says that state power is greater than federal power?
The argument that state power is greater than federal power is commonly referred to as "states' rights." This concept emphasizes the authority and autonomy of individual states to govern themselves and make decisions independent of the federal government. Proponents of states' rights often argue that the Constitution grants states certain powers that should not be infringed upon by federal authority. This debate has historical roots in American politics, particularly in issues related to federalism and the balance of power.
