Opponents of ratification of the U.S. Constitution, known as Anti-Federalists, argued that it concentrated too much power in a central government at the expense of state sovereignty. They feared the potential for tyranny and the erosion of individual liberties, as the Constitution lacked a Bill of Rights to explicitly protect citizens' freedoms. Additionally, they believed that the proposed government structure favored the elite and would not adequately represent the interests of ordinary people. These concerns highlighted a desire for a more decentralized system that prioritized local governance and individual rights.
The answer to this question is this.... They opposed having such a strong central government and thus were against the Constitution.
The small states were not against ratification. The small states were the ones who stood to benefit most, so they were in favor of it.
Federalists were for the ratification of the Constitution. Those who opposed such ratification were called Anti-Federalists or Confederalists.
Federalists fought for the ratification of the constitution and anti-federalists fought against it. For more information, visit the Related Question.
One of the reasons for ratification was the nation could not pass taxes to pay for supplies in states.
One of the reasons for ratification was the nation could not pass taxes to pay for supplies in states.
the claim of 7 of 13 states
it had no bill of rights
by loling
they thought it gave equal rights to everyone
There were a number of reasons that the Federalists gave to defend their views on the ratification. The mainly supported as strong central government and state governments that did not have too much power.
True