DISCOVERY
Question makes no sense and actually answers itself. There is (1) the Prosecution and (2) the Defense. Period.
The Prosecution (the State) presents the case against the defendant. The Defense Attorney has to provide the defenses.
(in the US) There are no specific laws that single out mentally ill individuals for special prosecution. As a matter of fact, mental illness may well be a defense against criminal prosecution.
Criminal defense lawyers' goals are to be knowledgeable of and protect the client's rights through all steps of a criminal prosecution. Contrary to popular belief, a criminal defense lawyer's responsibility is not to get the client off. It is against the law for a criminal attorney to, with knowledge, support criminal activity, whether they are defense or prosecution attorneys. If the line between supporting criminal activity and protecting a client's privilege is in question, it usually decided by a through a judicial process.
That will depend on whether the case is a civil or criminal trial. In a civil court case the two sides are the defendant and the plaintiff. For a criminal court it will be the defendant (the accused) and the government entity bringing the charges, usually the State or Country.
5
Yes, the prosecution has a legal obligation to share evidence with the defense in a criminal case. This is known as the principle of disclosure, which ensures a fair trial and allows the defense to adequately prepare their case.
Harry I. Subin has written: 'Federal criminal practice' -- subject(s): Defense (Criminal procedure), Prosecution
Yes, if the testimony is to rebut or impeach evidence given in the defense case in chief.
In criminal court you have two sides advocating for their particular party. The prosecutor arguing for the state, and the defense arguing for the defendant. They are adversaries. Thus, an adversarial system, not a cooperative system.
The sides in a civil trial are the same as a criminal trial. There is a plaintiff and a defendant. In a criminal trial the plaintiff is usually the jurisdictioni charging the defendant.
(in the US) In criminal trials - the defense ALWAYS makes the final closing argument before the judge and/or jury.However, according to the rules of criminal procedure, the prosecution does retain a right (if it wishes) to make a rebuttal argument. Sometimes the prosecution choosese to exercise this right, sometimes they do not.If the prosecution chooses to exercise the right to make a rebuttal argument there is no right to a "re-rebuttal" by the defense.