The authority to set up a system of federal courts was granted to Congress by the U.S. Constitution. Article III of the Constitution establishes the judicial branch and allows Congress to create inferior courts under the Supreme Court. This provision enables Congress to determine the structure and jurisdiction of the federal court system.
Veto or approve legislation
Federal Reserve Board
The states are given plenary or police power in the federal system. This means that all powers not granted to other branches of government are reserved for the states.
No. The responsibility of protecting the U.S. Federal Courts belongs to the United States Marshals Service. U.S. Marshals- Since 1789 The offices of U.S. Marshals and Deputy Marshal were created by the first Congress in the Judiciary Act of 1789, the same legislation that established the Federal judicial system. The Marshals were given extensive authority to support the federal courts within their judicial districts and to carry out all lawful orders issued by judges, Congress, or the president.
The judicial power granted to Congress under the U.S. Constitution allows it to establish inferior courts beneath the Supreme Court. This authority is outlined in Article III, Section 1, enabling Congress to create and organize various lower courts, such as district courts and courts of appeals. These courts handle federal cases, ensuring the judiciary operates effectively and can manage the caseload that the Supreme Court does not directly address. This structure helps maintain a balanced and accessible legal system.
The chief justice not only heads up the Supreme Court, but also runs the Federal court system. For that reason his/her title is, "Chief Justice of the United States".
State courts have always had their own authority. In colonial times, each separate colony maintained its own government and tended to its own business legislatively and judicially. Thus, states already had judicial authority. There ws no federal government to superced state government in areas of federal concern as there is today. Before the US Constitution was created, the new United States operated under the Articles of Confederation. Under the Articles, states retained all of their original autonomy and authority especially with regard to judicial matters relating to their own legal matters. The US Constitution created a federal government that has only certain specific and limited powers that affected the states as a single country rather than as a group of individual state governments. The federal government's authority superseded state authority in those national areas but left state authority that did not conflict with the federal authority intact. Judicial matters that arose only under state law were left to the state courts to handle. In order to enforce federal law in a consistent manner from one state to another, the Constitution created federal judicial authority but it was only over federal matters such as issues that arose under federal law. These are referred to as "federal questions." Therefore, the Constitution simply allowed the states to retain their already existing judicial authority. This was accomplished in the Constitution in Article III, which created the federal judiciary and gave it authority over federal questions. The Tenth Amendment stated that all powers not given to the federal government were retained by the states. Since the Constitution did not take away state court authority over internal matters, state courts retained that authority.
Knowing what the answer choices are would help a person know which is correct. To know which would not have the authority to function as courts of original jurisdiction the answer options need to be given.
Interpretation is left up to the Supreme Court and other lower courts. Agencies have no authority to interpret the Constitution.
The Legislative Branch is in control of inferior courts.
The Legislative Branch is in control of inferior courts.
The federal reserve system was given more centralized power