0
It is to open-ended, there are way to many loop holes in the ninth amendment.
The ninth amendment states "The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." It was James Madison's attempt to ensure the Bill of Rights was not seen as granting only the specific rights it addressed to the people of the United States. In recent years, some have interpreted it to mean the existence of "unenumerated" rights outside those expressly protected by the Bill of Rights.
What else can I help you with?
What does amendent mean?
Change, alteration.
What is the privacy amendment?
Privacy amendent does not exist..
Was the concept of piecework considered controversial?
Yes
Why is santeria religion controversial?
It seems that anything that isn't considered a 'main stream' religion is thought to be controversial.
Abolished slavery in all states?
13th amendent
How many states are needed to ratify an amendent?
38
Why is video games considered to be controversial?
The violence i guess
What is a this is used to be called a planet but now isn't?
In 1930, Pluto was considered to be the ninth planet from the Sun.But, after the discovery of similar worlds deeper in the distant of the Kuiper Belt, icy Pluto was reclassified as a dwarf planet. Which meant that Pluto was demoted (a very controversial decision) and was no longer considered a planet in our solar system, which I think was a shame.
Which Amendent was most recent one to be passed?
27th amendment
Which euclidean axiom has been considered controversial?
the 5th one
Why was john brown considered such a controversial abolitionist?
He was good guy.
Why is the ninth amendment cosidered to be controversial?
The Ninth Amendment is considered controversial because it asserts that the enumeration of certain rights in the Constitution does not imply that other unenumerated rights do not exist. This has led to debates over the scope of individual rights and the limits of government power. Critics argue that it creates ambiguity, allowing for judicial interpretation that could expand rights beyond those explicitly stated in the Constitution, while supporters believe it protects fundamental liberties that may not be explicitly listed. This tension raises questions about the balance between federal authority and personal freedoms.
