Not enough is known about the work situation in order to comment. Are there safety or sanitation or cleaniness issues that enter into the scenario? Do some work in different areas that must be klept smokefree? If the discrimination is done strictly on the basis of favoritism it's probably not "fair," but I don't believe that any law (that I am aware of) protects against deiscrimination based on people's smokiing habits.
If the person with the liens is employed in a "position of trust' within the company and the employer believes that because of the employees financial status that his trust in that person may be misplaced, or that his trust is in jeapordy, he may, at his discretion, take some kind of action to protect his interests. (Note: If you are employed in a "right-to-work" state, your employer can make any change in your employment he wishes, up to and including discharging you.).
Employees are required to follow workplace health and safety rules, report any hazards or incidents to their employer, cooperate with the employer in implementing safety measures, and use provided protective equipment properly. They also have the right to refuse work if they believe it poses a serious risk to their health and safety.
Employers typically do not have the right to physically follow you without your consent. However, they may monitor your work-related activities during work hours and on company-owned devices. It's important to review your employer's policies regarding tracking and monitoring to understand what is permitted.
No, they should not be monitored because it is proven by experts in the business enterprise textbook that letting employers make decisions on their own motivates them to work harder.Another AnswerMonitoring is a fact of life. You agree to it when you sign your employment application and/or you agree to it everytime you use the employer's computer system. Calls are potentially monitored. Everything is monitored.The employer has a vested interest in monitoring, particularly when employees have a great deal of power, such as when they hold high places in Information Technology or Management. The employer can not afford to risk a bad employee.You are already subject to random drug testing/monitoring. There is no difference between that and random phone call or computer monitoring. After all, this is the employer's property, and they have the right to monitor.Besides, why should you be concerned. If you are monitored, and you are honest and ethical, what is the problem? If you are not honest or ethical, then certainly you have reason for concern, but to be candid, I would not want you as an employee either.I happen to have nearly 40 years working in the IT business, and I know that monitoring is there, and it happens. That actually makes me feel better, because I know that the company is watching out and, at a certain level, the monitoring will prove me out when the brown smelly stuff hits the fan. In my industry, the more you know, the larger a risk you present, and, in my humble opinion, monitoring is appropriate and justified.Its no different than the monitoring you might experience if you fly on a commercial airline. The TSA is going to monitor you, they are going to profile you, and they are going to do whatever it takes to make your flight safe. Personally, I would rather have that, then worry about some terrorist taking down my flight and killing us all.
i hope this is right. There was a contoroversial dispute in the auditorium today.
no
Right concerning WHAT? The employer simply asks the employees raters, presumably the employees supervisor and manager to re-do and re-submit their evaluation.
The effective employer expects employees to always make the right decision. :) A+
No, an employer cannot legally force you to work against your will. Employees have the right to refuse work that is unsafe or violates labor laws.
No, an employer cannot force you to be covered by their health plan. They might be telling you that you are "auto-enrolled", which is required by the Affordable Care Act. However, you have the right to refuse coverage. You may have to sign a form for the health insurer, so that the employer does not get "dinged" by the insurer for having employees uninsured. The employer's contract with the insurer generally requires them to enroll all employees (if employees do not pay part of the cost), or some percentage of employees (if employees do pay part of the cost). Your dropping out skews their numbers.
You have the right to file for unemployment, but if you receive a severance package from your employer you may be violating the terms of your severance package by filing for unemployment.
No one "files for" FMLA with some agency - it is a unilateral grant from the employer. Once the employer has enough info to know whether the employee qualifies or does not qualify for FMLA, the employer MUST issue a letter announcing whether it it granting or denying FMLA. EMployees need not request FMLA to get it, but must comply with employer demands for medical certification.
The collective labor law relates to the relationship between the employee, employer, and union. The individual labor law concerns the employees right to work.
An employer is never in a position to 'punish' an employee, and is in big legal trouble if he does it and the employee can prove it in court. No law restricts an employer's right to discipline employees with schedule changes. Employers face no court imposed liability for doing so. An employer can't 'make' his employees do anything. The employer can state the work assignment, and then each employee is free to choose among three options in response: 1). Comply, 2). Negotiate, 3). Walk.
If the person with the liens is employed in a "position of trust' within the company and the employer believes that because of the employees financial status that his trust in that person may be misplaced, or that his trust is in jeapordy, he may, at his discretion, take some kind of action to protect his interests. (Note: If you are employed in a "right-to-work" state, your employer can make any change in your employment he wishes, up to and including discharging you.).
Yes, they have the right to ask you how old you are.
Yes, employees can sue their employer for retaliation in the workplace if they believe they have been treated unfairly or punished for exercising their legal rights, such as reporting discrimination or harassment. Retaliation is illegal under employment laws and employees have the right to seek legal recourse if they believe they have been retaliated against.