0
What else can I help you with?
What is meant the term landmark case?
Landmark cases are cases that got such big publicity and world change because of the change. For example, Miranda was changed.Miranda is your rights that which are read to you when you get arrested.(a case in which the Supreme Court's decision greatly alters the interpretation of a law)
What describes using prior cases as a guide for deciding similar new cases?
Using prior cases as a guide for deciding similar new cases is known as precedent. This concept is fundamental in common law legal systems where past decisions by higher courts serve as authoritative guidance for current and future cases. Precedent helps ensure consistency, predictability, and fairness in the legal system.
What word refers to past decisions involving similar cases?
The word, "Precedent" is good place to start.
Prior are cases who's principles are used by judges to decide current cases are called?
Precedent cases are those whose principles are used by judges to decide current cases. Judges rely on the decisions and reasoning of prior cases to guide their judgment in similar situations.
What is the term to describe when a previous court decision is used in a later case?
The term is "precedent." It refers to how decisions made in earlier cases are used as a basis for deciding similar cases in the future.
How were the Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v wainwright cases similar?
Both cases resulted in expanded protections for people accused of crimes.
How were the Miranda v. Arizona and Gideon v. Wainwright cases similar?
Answer this question… Both cases resulted in expanded protections for people accused of crimes.
What did gideon case have to do with the Miranda rights?
The Gideon v. Wainwright case (1963) established the right to counsel, ruling that states are required to provide an attorney to defendants who cannot afford one in criminal cases. This decision laid the groundwork for the Miranda rights, which emerged from Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The Miranda rights ensure that individuals in police custody are informed of their right to an attorney and the right against self-incrimination, reinforcing the principles established in Gideon regarding fair legal representation. Together, these cases underscore the importance of legal rights in protecting defendants' due process.
What was the result of Escobedo v Illinois?
Escobedo was denied the right to an attorney. He was questioned for over 14 hours and not allowed to speak to an attorney during that time.https://www.oyez.org/cases/1963/615
Is the government one of the parties in criminal law?
Yes, in criminal cases, the government is represented by the prosecutor. When a defendant is being charged with a crime, they are being accused of violating a rule that the government has issued, thus a "criminal trial" is essentially the government "suing" a defendant. On paper, when citing a case, the plaintiff (or prosecution) is always listed first, so you can infer that Arizona v. Johnson is a criminal trial because the state is listed first. The state of Arizona is seeking retribution from the a defendant: Johnson. However, cases like Miranda v. Arizona, a person, Miranda, is listed first. Because Miranda is listed first, you can infer that Miranda is seeking retribution from the state of Arizona. Any case where a person is listed before a state (or two people are listed, without a state) is a civil case.In the case of Miranda v. Arizona, Miranda sued the state of Arizona because he did not understand his rights (which consequently became the Miranda Rights). In a case like Gideon v. Wainwright, you can also infer that this is a civil case because a person is, again, listed first (and a state is not listed at all). So, Gideon sued Wainwright.
what was the Gideon VS Wainwright case in 1963?
Clarence Gideon was accused of breaking into a pool hall in Florida . he asked for a lawyer , but Florida law at the time only provided for court appointed lawyers in capital / death penalty cases . Gideon lost the original case . but won his appeal to the supreme court , where the court ruled that the 6th amendment right to a lawyer applied to felony cases. if the defendant could not afford a lawyer, the state had to provide one .
What is the prior use of cases to decide later cases that are similar?
A precedent
Warren Court?
Lead by Chief Justice Earl Warren, it was known for preserving individual rights and many claimed that the decisions it made overstepped its jurisdiction and was too involved in people's lives. Cases included Brown v. Board of Education, Gideon v. Wainwright, Griswold v. State of CT, Miranda v. Arizona, and Loving v. State of VA.
What are the three landmark supreme court cases that changed America?
Brown v. Board of education, Gideon v. Wainwright, plessy v. Ferguson
Which recent US Supreme Court cases have affected Miranda warning requirements?
Dickerson v. United States
If supreme court justice were to argue using a precedent what might he or she do?
Site other cases that came to similar conclusions
What was the outcome of the case of Gideon vs Wainwright?
Gideon vs. Wainwright is a US Supreme Court Case from 1963. The vote was unanimous. This court case decided under the fourth amendment, state courts are required to provide an attorney in criminal cases when the defendant cannot afford one.
