0
In Schenck v. US when did the Supreme Court say speech could be more dangerous to the country?
Wiki User
∙ 7y ago
During a time of war. -Apex
TheBestPyro2505
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is dangerous speech?
Dangerous speech refers to expressions that can incite violence or harm against individuals or groups based on their identity. This type of speech can lead to real-world consequences by fueling hatred, discrimination, and conflict. It is important to recognize and counter dangerous speech to protect vulnerable populations and promote peaceful coexistence.
What are the different kinds of speech that the Supreme Court has identified?
The Supreme Court has identified three types of speech: fully protected speech, which includes political or artistic expression and is protected by the First Amendment; partially protected speech, which includes commercial speech and is subject to certain restrictions; and unprotected speech, such as obscenity, defamation, and speech that incites violence, which is not protected by the First Amendment.
Why has the supreme court upheld prohibition of slander and libel?
The Supreme Court upholds the prohibition of slander and libel because these forms of speech can cause harm to individuals' reputations and can lead to the spread of false information. Protecting individuals from false and harmful statements is deemed crucial in maintaining social order and ensuring a fair and just society.
Is a speech considered a criminal act?
No, giving a speech is not considered a criminal act unless the content of the speech incites violence or is a form of hate speech that is prohibited by law. In most cases, a speech is protected by freedom of speech laws.
What is a good thesis sentence for freedom of speech?
"Freedom of speech is a fundamental human right that allows individuals to express their thoughts, ideas, and opinions without fear of censorship or retaliation, serving as a cornerstone of democracy and societal progress."
What did The Supreme Court decision in Schenck v the US most affect?
Freedom of speech
What did the supreme court decision in schenck v. the US most affected?
Freedom of speech
The supreme court decision in schenck v. the US most affected what?
ur mom
What did the supreme court decide in schenck v the United states?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
What did supreme court decide in schenck v the US?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies.
What law was upheld as constitutional in the supreme court case of schenck v. United states?
Limits to free speech were constitutional during national emergencies
What court case restricted freedom of speech during World War 1?
Schenck v. United States
What was the main issue in the case of US v Schenck in 1919?
something somethong FREE SPEECH.---- trust me ;)
What supreme court says about privileged speech for members of congress?
The Supreme Court recognizes "privileged speech" for members of Congress so long as that speech is
What is the part of speech of dangerous in the following sentence The weather can be dangerous?
Dangerous is an adjective.
Why did the supreme court rule that money is speech?
They didn't.
What does the term clear and present danger have to do with censorship?
"Clear and present danger" is a test derived from Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr's opinion in the Supreme Court case Schenck v. US, (1919), that first set established legal exceptions to, or restrictions on, the exercise of First Amendment free speech depending on the content and context of the speech. In other words, "clear and present danger" was the standard used to determine whether free speech could be censored or punished.Holmes' simplest analogy involves "shouting fire in a crowded theater," an activity that (in the absence of fire), could put people in danger and lead to injuries. Holmes asserted the First Amendment was never intended to protect that kind of free speech.In Schenck v. US, the Supreme Court upheld the 1917 Espionage Act as constitutional and affirmed the convictions of Charles Schenck and Elizabeth Baer for distributing anti-war pamphlets that encouraged conscripted soldiers to resist the draft and refuse to fight in World War I. The Court held their speech wasn't protected because it threatened to interfere with military recruiting.Case Citation:Schenck v. United States, 249 US 47 (1919)
