0
On what bases did slavery in the Americas and slavery in the Islamic regions differ?
Slavery in the Americas and slavery in the Islamic regions had many differences. In the Americas, slavery was largely racial, while in the Islamic regions, it was more focused on social class and religion. In the Americas, slaves were taken from Africa and the Caribbean, while in the Islamic world, slaves were drawn from a wide variety of places, including Africa, Asia, and Europe.
In terms of legal status, slaves in the Americas were treated as property, while in the Islamic world, slaves had a certain degree of legal protection and could be freed by their owners. Slaves in the Americas were not allowed to own land or property, while in the Islamic world, slaves could own land and property.
In terms of labor, slaves in the Americas were used primarily for labor on plantations and in mines, while slaves in the Islamic world could be used for a variety of jobs, including domestic labor, military service, and government service.
In terms of religion, slaves in the Americas were denied religious freedom and were forced to convert to Christianity, while in the Islamic world, slaves could practice their own religion.
In terms of treatment, slaves in the Americas were subject to horrific abuse and brutality, while in the Islamic world, slaves were generally treated with more respect and kindness. Slaves in the Americas were not allowed to marry or have children, while in the Islamic world, slaves were allowed to marry and have children.
Finally, in terms of punishment, slaves in the Americas were subject to the death penalty for minor crimes, while in the Islamic world, punishments were much less severe and certain crimes could be punished with fines.
What else can I help you with?
Why was slavery accepted in the colonies?
Slavery was accepted in the colonies primarily for economic reasons, as it provided a cheap source of labor for plantations and agricultural work. Additionally, there were existing racial prejudices that dehumanized African slaves and justified their enslavement in the eyes of many colonists. The legal and social structures of the time also supported and perpetuated the institution of slavery.
How did Lincoln and Douglas differ their views on slavery?
Lincoln believed that slavery was morally wrong and should not be expanded to new territories, while Douglas argued for popular sovereignty, allowing each state or territory to decide for themselves whether to allow slavery. Lincoln also believed that the Declaration of Independence's principle that "all men are created equal" applied to all individuals, regardless of race, while Douglas did not hold the same view.
Is Justice of the Peace compensation based upon productivity credits?
The compensation for Justices of the Peace can vary depending on the jurisdiction. In some cases, Justices of the Peace may receive compensation based on productivity credits, which are essentially fees collected for their services. However, this is not universal and the payment structure may differ between regions.
How did free labor advocates differ from abolitionists?
Free labor advocates were in favor of citizens have the freedom to do labor that they chose, while abolitionists were in favor of the emancipation of slaves. Although advocates of free labor were often grouped in with abolitionist during the antebellum period.
Laws differ from theories because laws don't provide what?
Laws differ from theories because laws describe observed patterns in nature or society, based on empirical evidence, while theories provide explanations and interpretations of these patterns. Laws do not provide the underlying mechanisms or reasons why these patterns exist, which is the function of a theory.
How did west African slavery differ from the kind of slavery that developed in America?
one way that salvery is differ in the Americas than the west African would be the platiation , because we don't have a large plantation in America
How does the climate and the environment differ in North's Americas regions?
I do t really know but I think is because of the equator
How did slavery in African and Muslim societies differ from slaveryin the Americas?
Slavery in African and Muslim societies was often based on social status or prisoners of war, and slaves had more opportunities for social mobility and could gain freedom through various means. In contrast, slavery in the Americas was primarily based on race, with slaves facing harsher living and working conditions, and often had little to no chance of gaining freedom.
How did slavery in west Africa differ from slavery practiced by European settlers?
because it was a different type of slavery.
How did the north and the south differ in their ideas about extending slavery?
the north didnt want slavery but the south want slavery
How did Ataturk's views on westernization differ from fundamental Islamic groups?
h
How did the practice of slavery differ between classical civilizations?
it didnt
How do Jacobs' descriptions of slavery's abuses--and the pathways to freedom--differ from Douglass'?
Jacobs' descriptions of slavery's abuses was he was all for it. Douglass however was not into the slavery abuse.
How did northern and southern attitudes differ?
They chucked it Down to the slavery comprimise.
How did slavery in African and Muslim societies differ from slavery in the Americas?
Roman slaves were Greek, white, educated, they were captured by war, and could be trusted to be unsupervised. Pre Civil war slaves were Aperican American, not educated, captured in great numbers and treated poorly on the ships to America, raped, beaten, and often used as a type of pay.
How did John Rutledge's and Gouverneur Morris' views of slavery differ?
they just were different
How did Abraham Lincoln and Stephen Douglas differ concerning the expansion of slavery?
They didn't
