answersLogoWhite

0

Inappropriate content can be censored, whether it be swearing, or sexual content.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What did Taft do to help restore order to the?

censored the press -US History, Nova Netcensored the press.


What conditions had to exist for a principal to exercise censorship of the student press according to the Hazelwood decision?

Broad and brief, all-inclusive answer: Under the First Amendment, school officials can censor non-forum student newspapers when they can justify their decision by stating an educational purpose. See below link for more particular information and amplification of the decision:


Which scenario describes a federal court going against the principle of precedent?

A federal judge rules that newspapers may be censored during an emergency despite earlier courts declaring this practice unconstitutional. -Apex


Who killed HRH Diana Princess of Wales?

Some say she was killed by her drunken driver, others by the Papparazzi, and still others by the driver of a mysterious white Fiat. The various Inquiries have revealed nothing except whitewashes, selective/ bad memories, and that Diana was becoming an embarrassing 'loose cannon' who wouldn't be controlled by her peers and society, and who had a social conscience and actually wanted to make the world a better place ("Shock! Horror!") Her death was guaranteed by the unexplainedly long delay in getting her into the actual hospital instead of treating her outside, as they did. The secret services of both England and France still have a lot of questions to answer, since they would know, but as they have refused to release all non-whitewashed facts and details it makes one wonder 'why? As the information was not released, permission cannot have been given, and a cover-up initiated just in case. The vested-interest suspects would be a combination (not in any order) of:- -Royalty -Aristocracy -Military/Industrial complex (eg mines) -United Nations-Politicians-Government/s-Church of England-IslamAll of these groups would have something to gain by her silencing. It is similar to the assassination of President Kennedy: one person (and not Lee Harvey Oswald) actually killed him by firing the fatal shot that exploded his skull and blew his brains out, but he cannot be fully blamed because he was following orders and there were many others who had a hand in it. So it is with Princess Diana : as a lot of people had something to gain by her death the finger cannot be pointed at just one particular person. Oh, come on, it was an accident,end of story.She entered a tunnel at very high speed with a blind-drunk chauffer at the wheel.That's not a recommended assassination method.All the conspiracy theories and endless inquests are just an obcene industry.This fine woman died a tragic , unecessary death.Let her rest in peace and get a life.That is what the vested interests and powers-that-be would like everyone to believe, but there are more questions raised that are not being answered, the Inquiries that have been held have been officially limited in their terms-of-reference, access to evidence, authorities, and witnesses: they are "Yes, Minister" Inquiries where the various Inquiries are only to officially confirm pre-determined conclusions, and not to actually find out the truth of what happened. Once upon a time an Inquiry was held, the case was closed, and that was it. Access to and dissemination of information was limited and controlled ie censored as required. However with the internet there is more information now available some would like suppressed. When something smells it means there's something rotten somewhere that someone has tried to cover up. For example, the missing white Fiat has now been found, but the Secret services of both countries and relevant witnesses were not permitted to be questioned: it was not even an option.Sometimes the obvious conclusions are not necessarily correct, as the truth can often only be determined when all the evidence has been looked at, all the avenues and loose-ends followed up, and all witnesses questioned. When this has not been done, especially in important politically-sensitive cases, it raises the question: "Why? What have they got to hide?". If the subject cannot even be raised, let alone asked questions about, then you have accepted deliberate censorship and control, and that is a result allgovernments would love to have ( but would deny): that is the end-result of deriding possible conspiracies.


Trending Questions
Sentence with sanction? Who elects the general atterney? Can a 16 year old move out on her own and be empanicpation from there family? What are the importance of the judiciary act of 1789? What is the present progressive tense for judge? Can a 15 year old move out of their parents home without their consent? Your neighbors have close to dead evergreen trees These trees appear to be pretty dead but the pine needles end up all over your lawn you will cut down the overhang as you are allowed But this will no? What are the four things that must be proven in negligence case? Is it legal for a 19 year old male to have intercourse with a 16 year old female in KY? Ask us of the following legalized marriage in the entire US between men and women of different races A. The Mendez v. Westminster decision B. The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo C. The Fourteenth Amen? Did Robert Livingston own slaves? What did taffy steal from the house? What is post box rule according to contract act? What sentence would a 17 year old receive if charged with a DWI and vehicular homicide? Can you rent a flat at 16 years of age? In of mice and men what is crook's opinion of george and Lennie desire to get land? How do you write a letter to principal for request form 137? Outdoor stair railing ct law? How did Anthony Johnson Acquire 250 acres of land? In which 1857 federal court case did the U.S. Supreme Court rule that slavery was permitted in U.S. territories and that slaves were not U.S. citizens?