Before a jury retires for deliberation the judge "instructs" them on the relevant law by either reading them the statute(s) or the appropriate excerpts so that they know and are aware of exactly what the law says on the matter they are about to deliberate on.
The jury does not directly decide on a death sentence or life sentence. If a defendant is found guilty, there will be a separate sentencing phase where the jury will consider evidence and decide on the appropriate punishment, which could include the death penalty or a life sentence.
Some common theories used to establish negligence include the "reasonable person" standard, which evaluates whether a person's actions were reasonable in a given situation; the "duty of care" concept, which assesses whether the defendant owed a duty of care to the plaintiff; and the "breach of duty" principle, which examines whether the defendant failed to meet the required standard of care. Additionally, the theory of "proximate cause" is used to determine whether the defendant's actions directly caused the plaintiff's harm.
In the United States, the court is required to appoint an attorney to represent a defendant who cannot afford one in a felony case, regardless of whether it is the defendant's first offense. This right to counsel is protected by the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
There is no blanket answer to this question. Whether the defendant testifies on their own behalf, is a legal strategy that the defense attorney will discuss with his client when the time comes.
No, a Grand Jury determines whether there is probable cause, and if a prosecutor has enough evidence to bring the case to trial. A petit jury determines the guilt or innocence of a defendant.
A defendant is punished after the jury has listened to the evidence during a trial, and decides whether or not the defendant is guilty.Added: After the jury delivers its decision the defendant will be sentenced by the judge according to the applicable law - then - the defendant's "punishment" will commence.
A. The defendant's intelligence
In a civil case, the jury decides whether the defendant is liable or not liable for the alleged harm or wrongdoing. In a criminal case, the jury decides whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of committing a crime. The standard of proof is higher in a criminal case (beyond a reasonable doubt) compared to a civil case (preponderance of the evidence).
A fine is a sentence, not a crime. Whether the prior offense was a felony would depend on what crime the defendant was sentenced to a fine for.
He was not sure whether he wanted to go, and his ambivalence was obvious as he pondered his decision.
Whether or not a defendant can cancel a deposition depends on whether it is a defense deposition. If it is the other side, the defendant cannot cancel a deposition.
A decision reached by a jury is called a "verdict." This verdict determines the outcome of a trial, typically indicating whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty in criminal cases, or finding for the plaintiff or defendant in civil cases. The verdict is usually based on the evidence presented during the trial and the jury's deliberations. Once reached, it is announced in court and becomes part of the official record.
No, a defendant in a civil case does not have to testify. It is their choice whether or not to take the stand and provide testimony.
This depends on whether the state has a parole system and if the defendant is eligible for it. For a 15 year sentence, if a state has a parole system, the defendant could be required to serve at least five years, perhaps even more if, for example, the defendant was convicted of violent crime. Each state that has a parole system dictates the minimum time a person must serve before being eligible for parole.
The test is whether or not the decision results in a profit.
A petit jury in a criminal trial decides whether or not a defendant is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The other type of jury, the Grand Jury, decides whether or not there is sufficient evidence to bring charges against a defendant prior to the trial. It does not decide whether or not the defendant is guilty. Therefore the Grand Jury is not bound by the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt.
1.) The length of the delay,2.) the reasons for it, 3.) whether the delay has in fact harmed the defendant and,4.)whether the defendant asked for a prompt trial.