answersLogoWhite

0

Special negligence refers to a specific duty of care owed by a party to another, typically arising due to a particular relationship or circumstance. Negligent misstatement occurs when false or misleading information is provided by one party to another, leading to financial loss or harm due to negligence in making the statement. Both concepts involve breaches of duty of care that result in harm or loss to another party.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

Compare and contrast Contributory negligence and Comparative Negligence?

Under both contributory and comparative negligence, the negligence of the defendant is not in doubt; it has been proved by the plaintiff. The basic difference between the two concepts is that comparative negligence attempts to compensate the plaintiff for some portion of her injuries, no matter how small, where as contributory negligence serves to bar completely a damage award for injury.


What Negligence remedies based on?

Once a negligent act has occurred it cannot be undone. In civil court there are no "remedies" to negligence devised, only possible compensation for the fact that it has already occcurred. A court action for damages MAY prove useful and as an impetus to establishing a remedy for the alleged negligent act.


What is the difference between Sole negligence and gross negligence?

Gross negligence occurs when someone acts in a manner that will compromise the safety of other people. Sole negligence only disregards an individual's own safety making him the cause of his own injury.


What is the purpose or the aim of damages in negligence?

Damages in negligence aim to compensate the injured party for the harm they have suffered as a result of someone else's negligent actions. The purpose is to restore the injured party to the position they would have been in had the negligence not occurred, by providing financial compensation for losses such as medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering.


What is the meaning of contributory negligence?

Contributory negligence is a rule of law that has been largely abolished in the U.S., as it deemed that a plaintiff who was even partially at fault for the incident, due to his own negligence, could not recover any damages from the defendant, who supposedly caused the incident. Contributory negligence refers to some amount of negligence on the part of the plaintiff, without which the incident would not have occurred. To explore this concept, consider the following contributory negligence definition.

Related Questions

What is gross negligent?

Gross negligence is when someone greatly negligent, leading to serious injury or death.


What word would not appear with the guide words Neck and negligence?

negligent


When a health institution is negligent for failing to ensure that an acceptable level of care is provided it is called?

negligence


What is negligence as an adjective?

The adjective form is negligent. Related adjectives are neglected and neglectful.


What is guilty of negligence in workmen's compensation?

It means that you were negligent in your actions, leading to your injuries.


What is the noun form of negligent?

The noun form of the adjective 'negligent' is 'negligence'. Negligence means the quality of being indifferent, careless, disregarding, and paying little or no attention to something. Some antonyms of negilgence are regard, interest, attention.


In a no fault state can negligent party of a auto accident sue for bodily injures?

If there is no fault, then by definition there is no negligent party - negligence implies fault.


Can you sue an attorney who represtented you in a bankruptcy but you incurred financial damages resulting from his negligence?

Yes, if you can prove that the he actually was negligent, and that his negligence caused your financial damages.


Which is TRUE about negligence as it applies to a Certifying Officer?

Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity.


Can negligent doctors be tried in consumer courts?

this would be a negligent claim, so it would not be dealt with in cosumer courts. Negligence cases would be tried as a tort in civil court.


Which of the follwing statements is true about negligence as it applies toa certifying officer?

A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity


What statement is TRUE about negligence as it applies to a Certifying Officer?

A Certifying Officer is presumed negligent when there is a fiscal irregularity