0
During World War II, Executive Order 9066 was issued by President Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1942, leading to the establishment of internment camps for Japanese-Americans. This order authorized the forced relocation and incarceration of around 120,000 individuals of Japanese ancestry living in the United States, including American citizens, without any criminal charges or trials.
What else can I help you with?
What is a rule made and enforced by government?
A rule made by the government is called a low.
What is the difference between nonlegal and legal rules?
Nonlegal rules are informal norms or guidelines that society follows without being legally enforced, such as social customs or etiquette. Legal rules, on the other hand, are formal regulations created and enforced by governing bodies, typically through laws and statutes, with consequences for non-compliance.
What laws were passed after the attack of pearl harbor?
After the attack on Pearl Harbor, America was in a state of shock. There was no laws passed in direct response, however, some important decisions were made. In response, America passed the declaration of war on Japan. FDR also passed the executive order requiring that all Japanese Americans be interned in concentration type camps.
Was prohibition successfully enforced?
No, prohibition was not culturally supported by populations well enough to be successful. The rules of prohibition were broken constantly in numerous ways, from home-made liquor that people sold to others who still wanted it to secret nightclubs just about any place you can imagine.
Is a contract valid if one of its terms breaks the law Why or why not?
No, a contract is not valid if one of its terms breaks the law. This is because contracts must be formed for a legal purpose and must comply with the law in order to be enforceable. If a contract includes a term that violates the law, that term is considered void and unenforceable, which may render the entire contract invalid. It is important for contracts to adhere to legal requirements to ensure their validity and enforceability.
What brought about the end of Japanese Internment Camps?
The end of the war made internment camps no longer neccssary or logical
Why did the Japanese put up with internment camps?
The Japanese Americans that were put in internment camps faced the racism of whites. They were afraid of the hatred of those around them that made threats.
How do relocation camps and internment camps differ?
They really were much different Relocation Camps and Internment camps were the same thing just that relocation camps were the real camps and internment camps were where the Japanese Americans had to go before they made the relocation camps.
Why did roosevelt move the Japanese to camps?
the citizens made the president put them in camps because they thought they wouldatack from the inside. by alexbeck26@yahoo.com
Why was the decision made to send the Japanese to camps?
A declared war with Japan. A declared war with Japan.
What was true about Japanese interment?
People were forced to leave their homes and businesses and made to live in concentration camps.
Why was the placement of Japanese Americans considered constitutional during ww2?
The Americans didn't trust the Japanese's, they thought they where spies. So they made most of the Japanese Americans to isolated camps till a year after the war was over.
What was an internment camp?
The Japanese Internment Camps were America's version of Concentration Camps for US citizens of Japanese ancestry. However we felt the term Interment was more "polite" than Concentration to describe the camps. There was little difference between them and Nazi Concentration Camps of the time, except that they were not also frequently Extermination Camps where inmates were deliberately executed en masse as in the Nazi camps.
What factors made the experience of interned japanese americans so difficult?
The Japanese Internment camps were so difficult because the Japanese people being kept there were American citizens. They weren't treated especially harshly, but the fact that Americans were being kept against their will was disturbing
What are some of the arguments that people made for the internment camps?
Proponents of the internment camps during World War II argued that they were necessary for national security, claiming that Japanese Americans could pose a risk of espionage or sabotage. They contended that the camps were a precautionary measure to protect the U.S. from potential threats, especially following the attack on Pearl Harbor. Additionally, some believed that the internment would prevent anti-Japanese sentiment from escalating into violence against individuals in the community. Lastly, the government framed the camps as a means of providing for Japanese Americans' safety in a time of heightened racial tension.
Why did they made concerntration camps?
they made concentration camps because the Navi people did not trust the Jewish
What were the really big different between the japenes camp and the concentration camps in wartime nazi Germany?
It is unclear whether you mean the Japanese internment camps in the USA or the POW camps in Japan, as comparisons are often made with both, so i will answer both questions: Nazi concentration camps were camps for civilians, designed to keep certain sections of society out of the way, as were the Japanese internment caps. The really big difference between the two was how people were treated, in the Nazi camps people were used as slave labour and killed, in the American camps people were allowed to live with their families and suffered no greater persecution. Japanese had not signed the Geneva convention (despite what 'Bridge on the River Kwai' said), so felt no obligation to treat the POWs well, in fact they viewed soldiers who surrendered as unworthy, so the felt justified in mistreating the POWs. The really big difference is that they were military institutions.
