answersLogoWhite

0

Sharecroppers were typically paid with a portion of the crop they harvested from the land they worked on. This system allowed landowners to provide housing, tools, and supplies in exchange for a share of the resulting harvest. Often, sharecroppers received a small portion of the profits, with the remainder going to the landowner as rent.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Continue Learning about Law

What was possibly true about contracts between landowners and sharecroppers?

Sharecropping contracts typically favored the landowners, often resulting in unfair terms for the sharecroppers. Landowners controlled the land, tools, and supplies, ultimately keeping a significant portion of the crops produced by sharecroppers. Sharecroppers were often left with very little profit or autonomy.


What way that landowners took advantage of sharecroppers was by?

Landowners often exploited sharecroppers by charging high interest rates on loans for supplies and equipment, resulting in perpetual debt for the sharecroppers. Additionally, landowners would often manipulate the accounting of crop yields and prices, leading to sharecroppers receiving lower profits than they deserved.


What were the traps that tied sharecroppers to the land?

Sharecroppers were often trapped by high interest rates charged by landowners for essential items like tools, seeds, and food, creating cycles of debt that were difficult to escape. Additionally, sharecroppers were often paid low wages, making it challenging to save enough money to leave the system. Discriminatory laws and lack of access to education or alternative employment opportunities further limited their ability to break free from the cycle of sharecropping.


What were freed slaves called when they worked on farms owned by other people and then they rented land and paid for it with the crops that they grew?

The freed slaves who worked on farms owned by other people and then rented land to pay for it with the crops they grew were known as sharecroppers. This system allowed them to work the land in exchange for a share of the crops produced, but often left them in a cycle of debt and dependency.


Why might the landowners want to keep the sharecroppers indebted to them?

Keeping sharecroppers indebted ensures a cheap and reliable labor force, as indebted sharecroppers are less likely to leave or demand better working conditions. It also gives landowners control over the sharecroppers' output, allowing them to maintain economic and social power over them.

Related Questions

How did sharecroppers get paid?

They were paid a percentage of the crop's market value.-Shay


What is the term for farmers who did not pay rent but worked th land they lived on?

The term for farmers who did not pay rent but worked the land they lived on is "sharecroppers." Sharecroppers typically paid a portion of their crops or profits to the landowner as rent. This system was prevalent in the Southern United States after the Civil War and often resulted in cycles of debt and poverty for the sharecroppers.


How were tenant farmers different from sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers were different from sharecroppers because they usually had their own tools and animals.


Who were sharecropper?

sharecroppers were farmers who rented land and paid a share of each years crop as rent; they did not own the land they worked.


What was the difference between tenant farmers and sharecroppers?

Tenant farmers rented land and paid a fixed rent to the landowner, while sharecroppers did not pay rent but instead received a portion of the crops they grew as payment. Sharecroppers typically had less control over their farming decisions and were more vulnerable to exploitation than tenant farmers.


What of food did the sharecroppers plant?

Sharecroppers could have planted:CottonRiceCorn


What group was least likely to prosper after the war?

The Sharecroppers farmers in the south will like not prosper after the war.


What were the advantages for the sharecroppers?

They were no longer enslaved but many became sharecroppers.


Were all sharecroppers African American?

No, all sharecroppers were not African American


Tenant farmers were more likely than sharecroppers to what?

own plows


Why did so many sharecroopers live in poverty?

sharecroppers were farmers who rented land and paid a share of each years crop as rented;they did not own the land they worked.


An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was?

An advantage of sharecropping over slavery was that sharecroppers had more independence and autonomy in their work. While still facing challenges, sharecroppers had the opportunity to negotiate terms and potentially earn a share of the profits from their labor.