If a trial is by jury, the jury will have the final decision in a court of law. If there is no trial by jury, the judge will have the final say.
If there is a problem with the constitutionally of a law the Supreme Court makes the decision. The president has no power.
The court, ultimately, can do whatever it wants. The court system is the final arbiter of all laws and of what is right and what is not. While a court decision may ultimately be appealed up the chain of appellate courts sooner or later the decision the final court makes is the binding law and failure to abide by whatever that decision is would be illegal.
A bailiff is kind of like the court policeman. He makes sure all the court policies are enforced and gives warnings to those who don't comply. He also announces the judge.
The decision rendered by a private arbitrator is "99.9 %" binding and neither party can appeal the result. Even "an error of law apparent on the face of the [decision] that causes substantial injustice does not provide grounds for [an appeal]." California Supreme Court in the Moncharsh decision (1992). In other words, if the arbitrator adds 2 + 2 and says that totals 5, too bad, his or her decision cannot be appealed to the courts to correct the error. Added: The above answer may be true and applicable in California, but it is not the prevailing rule in all states. Judgements made by lesser judicial officers, arbitrators, magistrates, justices of the peace, etc, are subject to the review and over-rule by a judge of the appropriate court. If the arbitrator (et al) makes an error that is not caught by the judge, the aribitrator's ruling may be appealed and possibly overturned by higher judicial authority.
Also known as a restraining order, a protection order is a court order that makes it illegal for a party to be within a specific distance of another. This is usually done by filing a claim at a local court and then filling out forms to detail the specific reason why the order has been requested. Usually, evidence and/or witnesses will likely need to be presented to a clerk or judge before a decision is made.
an injuction
a judge makes the final decision in a court of law.
It depends on the type of court. Ultimately the Judge has the final say in a criminal court.
There is no point at which the child can make that decision. The court may hear a request from a child but the court always makes the final decision.There is no point at which the child can make that decision. The court may hear a request from a child but the court always makes the final decision.There is no point at which the child can make that decision. The court may hear a request from a child but the court always makes the final decision.There is no point at which the child can make that decision. The court may hear a request from a child but the court always makes the final decision.
Neither makes the decision, the parole board makes the decision, but the victim's statement can impact their decision.
The Supreme Court
JUDICAL
If there is a problem with the constitutionally of a law the Supreme Court makes the decision. The president has no power.
Confiscated
The judge is the one who makes the decision.
JUDICAL
JUDICAL
The court, ultimately, can do whatever it wants. The court system is the final arbiter of all laws and of what is right and what is not. While a court decision may ultimately be appealed up the chain of appellate courts sooner or later the decision the final court makes is the binding law and failure to abide by whatever that decision is would be illegal.