As you probably know, stakeholders are the owners of the company. The employees work for the company and are compensated as such. Ideally, everyone gets along--employees feel appreciated through their pay and work, and stakeholders reap profits. Conflicts occur when the trust breaks down. Specifically, a shareholder may want to take money out of the company (in a dividend, for example), and the employees may feel a bonus for employees would be a better use of the money. The most common example I can think of is company expenses: stakeholders want a lean-and-mean company, and employees would enjoy more money be spent for their sake--higher benefits, award programs, etc. If these problems continue, both sides lose. A company without decent employees will not make money for the stakeholders, and eventually they will have to lay off employees because there is not enough money to pay them. That equals no money for stakeholders and no jobs/money for employees. A smart company will find a way to align the stakeholders and employees desires. Give employees some ownership in the company, or at least give them bonuses for running a tight ship. One thing to remember is that Shareholders and Stakeholders are not the same thing. They both have different meanings and different purposes
The average growth rate of employees in a company is 30 percent. Each company can figure out their own growth rate by subtracting the original amount of employees from the new amount, multiplying that number by 100 percent and then dividing the sum by the original amount.
minimum of 500
Usually, the more an employee feels an owenership-type investment in the company, the more they will care, and the harder they will work to make things better.
Differences among employees are better for new ideas. If all employees think alike there will be seldom ideas.
The company might have a better reputation or better benefits for its employees than other companies.
The mission statement for Hugo Boss focuses on values that are important to both the employees and the company. They also focus on having all employees contribute to make the company better.
A suggestion that might better a company could include offering employees access to better healthcare. Another suggestion could include working toward becoming a sustainable company by recycling and eliminating as much waste as possible.
Only humans can be employees. The employees of a subsidiary company are also the employees of the parent company, unless the subsidiary is unusually and intentionally independent.
A company which offers an employee incentive schemes can benefit from well-trained, loyal, motivated and productive employees. The employees performance and expertise level increases and the company is able to do better because of that.
Federal Employees' Distributing Company was created in 1948.
Federal Employees' Distributing Company ended in 1999.
Depending on what stakeholder it is, a shareholder = company gaining lots of profit consumers = operating in an ethical manner employees = better working enviroment
List and explain two advantages for a company that has salaried employees?
The Trammel Crow Company had 7,100 employees in 2002
There are many employees in that company
Can't think of any company which has over 6000000 employees. However, IBM has more the 500000 employees world wide.