One of the best ways for a small, defending Army to defeat a much larger one is to pick the battleground. For example, in Ancient Times, King Leonidas of Sparta defeated a much larger Persian army because they fought at the mountain pass of Thermopylae. The spartan men could line the entire mountain pass, however the Persians could only deploy a few men to attack. There is historical question about whether this battle was a true victory for Greece, as the Persians did eventually get past the Greek forces, however I believe this to be a Greek victory, as many Persians were lost. On the offensive, one should use his men wisely, make no sacrifices, and remember it is okay to retreat. Google Leonidas or Alexander the great to see historical examples of tactics beating strength in numbers.
Chat with our AI personalities
they dont have a specific amount. it could be 100-100000 in a army. depends on how big the kingdom is
No one was able to defeat Akbar But Maharana Pratap was the only one who opposed him. and defeated his generals in small skirmishes.
There are many places where one can find information regarding Army Ranger school and training. The best ways for one to obtain this information would be to visit the the US army website directly or speak with a local army recruiter.
The last General-in-Chief in the Civil War was U.S. Grant. He supervised two armies, one under Sherman and one under George Meade, apart from a small force in the Shenandoah under Sheridan.
Well, there were two well known cases of this. One was the Zulu, a fierce people who defeated the British by simply having more warriors. The other is the Ethiopians, who were a rich trading nation, able to afford modern weapons. They defeated the Europeans with their own technology.