The South was overwhelmingly cotton-based, and the liberating of the slaves deprived employers of their workforce. The economy was also dependent on a heavy import-export agenda which was strangled by the Union blockade. There was very little industry.
The North was highly industrialised, and benefitted from skilled immigrants arriving from Europe.
Segregation in the South was very different than in the North. It was made illegal in many areas for an African American person to be in the same room as a Caucasian person. The further away from the South, the more lenient the segregation rules were, but it was a travesty all around.
The North and the South grew apart, because they had very different opinions on slavery and if they should have it or not. They also grew apart when the Civil war took place. Why? They had different perspectives on almost EVERYTHING!
In the period lading up to the US Cvil War, the North had an emerging industrial economy. The South remained a plantation based agricultural economy with much less industrial capability than the North.
The gross national product of the South and North during the Civil War was at 15 percent. This is the amount of domestic savings which was invested in product throughout all states within the country.
The North and South had very different economies. The North relied on factories to make goods that they could sell or trade in their economy while the South's economy was mostly agricultural, relying mostly on cotton. -I know that that is the right answer because I am studying American History in school
North Korea is a Dictatorship and South Korea is a capitalist country.
China and North Korea have poorer economy compare to South Korea and Japan.
The economies of the North and South during the pre-Civil War era were fundamentally different; the North was industrialized and focused on manufacturing, while the South relied heavily on agriculture, particularly cotton, and utilized slave labor. These economic disparities led to conflicting interests and tensions over issues like tariffs, states' rights, and the expansion of slavery into new territories. The North's push for industrial growth and abolitionist sentiments clashed with the South's dependence on slavery and agricultural output, ultimately contributing to the sectional divide that fueled the Civil War.
south wont slaves the north did not
True
The North and South had very different economies. The North relied on factories to make goods that they could sell or trade in their economy while the South's economy was mostly agricultural, relying mostly on cotton. -those other answers were wrong
im sure u hav enough time to answer it yourself
The Civil War greatly improved the economy of the North but harmed the economy of the South.
North Korea's economic system is restricted due to it's communist form of government. South Korea's economic performance has no restrictions.
The North and South were based on different economies. The North was mainly a industrial-based economy and the South was a slave-based agrarian economy. Second, the South feared that the North would outvote the South in the Congress and conceivably force the abolition of slavery onto the south, as well as taxes and tarrifs which favored the North. Third, the South contended that they were a part of the Union by their own consent and that they were able to withdraw that consent whenever it suited them, thereby avoiding being outvoted by the North. Yet in the end, the whole thing boiled down to slavery.
Money is the same in both the North and the South. In different countries the money value is different.
Communist from the north ad the south has slowed down the economies of Laos and Cambodia